Abstract:This paper presents the dual‐stream frequency‐spatial fusion network for deepfake detection, which integrates spatial and frequency domain features to enhance detection accuracy and robustness. The network includes a spatial forgery feature extraction module, a frequency forgery feature extraction module, and a spatial‐frequency feature fusion module, using attention mechanisms to extract and fuse features. Extensive experiments demonstrate that dual‐stream frequency‐spatial fusion network outperforms existing methods, offering superior generalization and robustness across various deepfake datasets. In recent years, face forgery detection has gained significant attention, resulting in considerable advancements. However, most existing methods rely on CNNs to extract artefacts from the spatial domain, overlooking the pervasive frequency‐domain artefacts present in deepfake content, which poses challenges in achieving robust and generalized detection. To address these issues, we propose the dual‐stream frequency—spatial fusion network is proposed for deepfake detection. The dual‐stream frequency‐spatial fusion network consists of three components: the spatial forgery feature extraction module, the frequency forgery feature extraction module, and the spatial–frequency feature fusion module. The spatial forgery feature extraction module employs spatial‐channel attention to extract spatial domain features, targeting artefacts in the spatial domain. The frequency forgery feature extraction module leverages the focused linear attention to detect frequency domain anomalies in internal regions, enabling the identification of generated content. The spatial–frequency feature fusion module then fuses forgery features extracted from both the spatial and frequency domains, facilitating accurate detection of splicing artefacts and internally generated forgeries. This approach enhances the model's ability to more accurately capture forgery characteristics. Extensive experiments on several widely‐used benchmarks demonstrate that our carefully designed network exhibits superior generalization and robustness, significantly improving deepfake detection performance.

Dual-Modality Co-Learning for Unveiling Deepfake in Spatio-Temporal Space.

Hierarchical Supervisions with Two-Stream Network for Deepfake Detection.

Refining Localized Attention Features with Multi-Scale Relationships for Enhanced Deepfake Detection in Spatial-Frequency Domain

Dynamic Difference Learning with Spatio-temporal Correlation for Deepfake Video Detection

Learning a Deep Dual-Level Network for Robust DeepFake Detection

Delving into the Local: Dynamic Inconsistency Learning for DeepFake Video Detection

Spatiotemporal Inconsistency Learning for DeepFake Video Detection

Learning spatial‐frequency interaction for generalizable deepfake detection

Multi-attentional Deepfake Detection

Unified Video and Image Representation for Boosted Video Face Forgery Detection

Spatio-temporal Features for Generalized Detection of Deepfake Videos

Exploring varying color spaces through representative forgery learning to improve deepfake detection

A Temporal Consistency Learning Framework for Face Forgery Detection

Unearthing Common Inconsistency for Generalisable Deepfake Detection

Multimodal Deepfake Detection for Short Videos

Spatial-frequency feature fusion based deepfake detection through knowledge distillation

Noise-aware progressive multi-scale deepfake detection

Exploiting Complementary Dynamic Incoherence for DeepFake Video Detection

Interactive Two-Stream Network Across Modalities for Deepfake Detection

AVoiD-DF: Audio-Visual Joint Learning for Detecting Deepfake

Learning Spatiotemporal Inconsistency via Thumbnail Layout for Face Deepfake Detection