Abstract:As a new programming paradigm, deep learning (DL) has achieved impressive performance in areas such as image processing and speech recognition, and has expanded its application to solve many real-world problems. However, neural networks and DL are normally black-box systems; even worse, DL-based software are vulnerable to threats from abnormal examples, such as adversarial and backdoored examples constructed by attackers with malicious intentions as well as unintentionally mislabeled samples. Therefore, it is important and urgent to detect such abnormal examples. Although various detection approaches have been proposed respectively addressing some specific types of abnormal examples, they suffer from some limitations; until today, this problem is still of considerable interest. In this work, we first propose a novel characterization to distinguish abnormal examples from normal ones based on the observation that abnormal examples have significantly different (adversarial) robustness from normal ones. We systemically analyze those three different types of abnormal samples in terms of robustness and find that they have different characteristics from normal ones. As robustness measurement is computationally expensive and hence can be challenging to scale to large networks, we then propose to effectively and efficiently measure robustness of an input sample using the cost of adversarially attacking the input, which was originally proposed to test robustness of neural networks against adversarial examples. Next, we propose a novel detection method, named attack as detection (A 2 D for short), which uses the cost of adversarially attacking an input instead of robustness to check if it is abnormal. Our detection method is generic, and various adversarial attack methods could be leveraged. Extensive experiments show that A 2 D is more effective than recent promising approaches that were proposed to detect only one specific type of abnormal examples. We also thoroughly discuss possible adaptive attack methods to our adversarial example detection method and show that A 2 D is still effective in defending carefully designed adaptive adversarial attack methods—for example, the attack success rate drops to 0% on CIFAR10.

Normal Vs. Adversarial: Salience-based Analysis of Adversarial Samples for Relation Extraction

Attack As Detection: Using Adversarial Attack Methods to Detect Abnormal Examples.

Understanding and Benchmarking the Commonality of Adversarial Examples

Adversarial for Good – Defending Training Data Privacy with Adversarial Attack Wisdom

READ: Improving Relation Extraction from an ADversarial Perspective

Why Should Adversarial Perturbations Be Imperceptible? Rethink the Research Paradigm in Adversarial NLP

Transfer Learning for Relation Extraction Via Relation-Gated Adversarial Learning

Adversarial Training for Relation Extraction.

Adversarial Multi-lingual Neural Relation Extraction.

Pointing out the Shortcomings of Relation Extraction Models with Semantically Motivated Adversarials

Relation Adversarial Network for Low Resource Knowledge Graph Completion

Adversarial Attacks against Deep Saliency Models

Detection defense against adversarial attacks with saliency map

Distinguishing Non-natural from Natural Adversarial Samples for More Robust Pre-trained Language Model

Denoising Distant Supervision for Relation Extraction via Instance-Level Adversarial Training.

Attention-SA: Exploiting Model-approximated Data Semantics for Adversarial Attack

Detecting Adversarial Samples for Deep Learning Models: A Comparative Study

Adversarial example detection based on saliency map features

Detection by Attack: Detecting Adversarial Samples by Undercover Attack

Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning Models in Natural Language Processing: A Survey

Attacks Meet Interpretability: Attribute-steered Detection of Adversarial Samples