C1-ring Osteosynthesis Versus C1-2 Fixation Fusion in the Treatment of Unstable Atlas Fractures: a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study with 5-Year Follow-Up.

Liang Yan,Jinpeng Du,Junsong Yang,Baorong He,Dingjun Hao,Bolong Zheng,Xiaobin Yang,Hua Hui,Tuanjiang Liu,Xiaodong Wang,Hua Guo,Jian Chen,Shaofei Wang,Shengzhong Ma,Shengli Dong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.12.spine211063
2022-01-01
Journal of Neurosurgery Spine
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term effects of posterior C1-ring osteosynthesis and C1-2 fixation fusion in the treatment of unstable atlas fractures.METHODS:A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted to analyze 73 patients with atlas fractures who underwent posterior fixation. The intervention group was treated with C1-ring osteosynthesis, and the control group was treated with C1-2 fixation fusion. The patients were followed up for 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years after the operation.RESULTS:Fifty-two patients had complete data at the last follow-up. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for neck pain in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (p < 0.001). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, radiation dose, bedridden period, hospital stay, and cost in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the control group (p < 0.001). At the last follow-up, the Neck Disability Index in the intervention group was higher than that of the control group, and the angle of flexion-extension and axial rotation in the intervention group were greater than those in the control group (p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS:In this study, the authors found that posterior C1-ring osteosynthesis is superior to C1-2 fixation fusion in terms of long-term relief of neck pain and preservation of the physiological function of the cervical vertebrae. This technique is a reliable choice for the treatment of unstable C1 fractures.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?