U.S. public perceptions of the sensitivity of brain data

Shenyang Huang,Umika Paul,Shikhar Gupta,Karen Desai,Melinda Guo,Jennifer Jung,Beatrice Capestany,William D Krenzer,Dylan Stonecipher,Nita Farahany
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad032
IF: 3.4
2024-01-01
Journal of Law and the Biosciences
Abstract:Abstract As we approach an era of potentially widespread consumer neurotechnology, scholars and organizations worldwide have started to raise concerns about the data privacy issues these devices will present. Notably absent in these discussions is empirical evidence about how the public perceives that same information. This article presents the results of a nationwide survey on public perceptions of brain data, to inform discussions of law and policy regarding brain data governance. The survey reveals that the public may perceive certain brain data as less sensitive than other ‘private’ information, like social security numbers, but more sensitive than some ‘public’ information, like media preferences. The findings also reveal that not all inferences about mental experiences may be perceived as equally sensitive, and perhaps not all data should be treated alike in ethical and policy discussions. An enhanced understanding of public perceptions of brain data could advance the development of ethical and legal norms concerning consumer neurotechnology.
ethics,law,medicine, legal,medical ethics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?