Optimization of image reconstruction method of cerebral blood flow perfusion imaging with digital CZT SPECT

Yaqian Zhou,Shen Wang,Peng Wang,Ning Li,Xuan Wang,Wei Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001540
2022-01-01
Nuclear Medicine Communications
Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of filtered back projection (FBP), ordered subset expectation maximisation (OSEM), and different filters on cadmium zinc telluride single-photon emission computed tomography [CZT single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)] cerebral blood perfusion image quality to optimise the image reconstruction method. Methods Under routine clinical conditions, tomographic imaging was performed on the phantom and patients. Image processing included image reconstruction using FBP and OSEM, and the filtering method used Butterworth (Bw) and Gaussian (Gs) filters. Visual and semi-quantitative parameters [integral uniformity, root mean square (RMS) noise and contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)] were used to evaluate image quality to optimise image reconstruction parameters. One-way and two-way analysis of variance were used to process phantom and clinical data. Results In the tomographic images of the phantom, the semi-quantitative analysis showed that the integral uniformity of FBP+Bw was better than that of OSEM+Bw and OSEM+Gs (P < 0.05), and that the RMS noise of FBP+Bw was lower than that of OSEM+Bw and OSEM+Gs (P < 0.001). The contrast of FBP+Bw and OSEM+Bw in the cold area diameter >= 2 cm group was higher than that of OSEM+Gs (P < 0.001), whereas the CNR of FBP+Bw was higher than that of OSEM+Bw and OSEM+Gs (P < 0.001); the contrast of OSEM+Bw cold area diameter <2 cm was higher than that of FBP+Bw (P < 0.01). The semi-quantitative analysis results of the clinical images were consistent with the phantom's. Conclusion In CZT SPECT cerebral blood flow perfusion imaging, it is suggested that the image postprocessing method of FBP+Bw (fc = 0.40; n = 10) should be used routinely in clinical application, and if there are uncertain small lesions in the processed image, it is suggested to use the reconstruction method of OSEM+Bw (EM-equivalent iterations = 60; fc = 0.45; n = 10) instead.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?