Computed Tomography in the Size Measurement of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Implication to Risk Stratification and "Wait-and-see" Tactics.

Yuyi Li,Xuyong Chen,Xu Ma,Xinliang Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2022.01.007
IF: 4.037
2022-01-01
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Abstract:Introduction: This study aimed to compare the radiologic size of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) on computed tomography (CT) with the pathologic size in a Chinese population, and elucidate the potential significance of the CT size in the preoperative risk stratification.Materials and methods: The study enrolled 314 patients treated by endoscopic/surgical resection of gastric lesions that proved postoperatively to be GISTs. Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were adopted to assess the size agreement between CT and pathology. Independent predictors of risk category underestimation and the optimal cut-off value of CT size were determined by logistic regression analysis and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Results: CT underestimated gastric GISTs size by 0.30 cm [95% confidence interval (CI): (-0.42, - 0.19); p < 0.001]. In the subgroup analysis, the size underestimation was 0.10 cm in GISTs <= 5 cm [95% CI: (-0.19, -0.01); p = 0.024]; and 0.75 cm in GISTs >5 cm [95% CI: (-1.05, 0.45), p < 0.001]. Though ICC values showed well reliability for the corresponding pathologic size, with 0.95 in all size, 0.86 in size <= 5 cm, and 0.92 in size >5 cm respectively. Risk underestimation by CT imaging mainly occurred in gastric GISTs with smaller size (<= 5 cm; p = 0.010) and lower mitotic index (<= 5 per 50 high-power fields; p = 0.011). CT size of 3.65 cm was defined as an absolute cut-off to differentiate intermediate/ high-risk patients from low-risk group, with 87.5% sensitivity at a specificity of 57.8%.Conclusion: Preoperative CT underestimated the mean size by 0.30 cm in gastric GISTs. A CT size of 3.65 cm would facilitate the selection of potential intermediate/high-risk patients, instant intervention should be encouraged in the absence of contraindications.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?