Abstract:Objective: To construct a simple scoring model for predicting the biological risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on enhanced computed tomography (CT) features. Methods: The clinicopathological and imaging data of 149 patients with primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor were retrospectively analyzed in our hospital. According to the risk classification, the patients were divided into low-risk group and high-risk group. The features of enhanced CT were observed and recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the predictors of high-risk biological behaviors of gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and then a simple scoring model was constructed according to the regression coefficients of each predictor. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the predictive ability of the model. Results: There was no significant difference between the risk classification of gastrointestinal stromal tumor with gender and age (P = .168, .320), while significant difference was found between the tumor size and location (P < .001). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that tumor size, enlarged vessels feeding or draining the mass, peritumoral lymph node enlargement, and venous phase contrast enhancement rate were independent predictors of the biological risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (P < .05). The area under the curve value of tumor size, enlarged vessels feeding or draining the mass, peritumoral lymph node enlargement, and venous phase contrast enhancement rate as the high-risk predictor of gastrointestinal stromal tumor were 0.955, 0.729, 0.680, and 0.807, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve results showed that the area under the curve of the scoring model constructed based on enhanced CT features was 0.941 (95% confidence interval: 0.891-0.973). When the total score was >1, the sensitivity of the scoring model in diagnosing gastrointestinal stromal tumor was 85.58%, the specificity was 88.89%, the positive predictive value was 88.51%, the negative predictive value was 86.04%, and the accuracy was 86.18%. The results of DeLong test showed that the area under the curve of the scoring model was better than that of the receiver operating characteristic curve of tumor size, enlarged vessels feeding or draining the mass, peritumoral lymph node enlargement, venous phase contrast enhancement rate, and other indicators alone in predicting the high risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and the differences were statistically significant (Z = 26.510, P < .001; Z = 3.992, P < .001; Z = 6.353, P < .001; Z = 4.052, P = .013). Conclusion: The simple scoring model based on enhanced CT features is a simple and practical clinical prediction model, which is helpful to make preoperative individualized treatment plan and improve the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor risk classification: spectral CT quantitative parameters

A Multi-Class Scoring System Based on CT Features for Preoperative Prediction in Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

A Scoring Model for Radiologic Diagnosis of Gastric Leiomyomas (glms) with Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CE-CT): Differential Diagnosis from Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (Gists)

A Radiologic Diagnostic Scoring Model Based on CT Features for Differentiating Gastric Schwannoma from Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Building contrast-enhanced CT-based models for preoperatively predicting malignant potential and Ki67 expression of small intestine gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)

[Correlation Between the CT Features and Malignancy Risk of Small (≤5 Cm) Gastric Stromal Tumors].

Differentiation of Smaller (≤5 cm) Gastric Schwannoma From gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor:Applied Value of CT

Predictive Value of Two-Phase Contrast Enhanced MSCT in Different Risk of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

[The feasibility analysis of multi-slice spiral CT features of gastric stromal tumors in predicting pathological National Institutes of Health risk classification]

Risk Stratification of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Are Imaging Findings and Histopathological Features Correlated?

Application Value of Spectral CT Imaging in Quantitative Evaluation of Lauren Classification of Gastric Cancer

Comparative Study on Pre- Diagnosed Computed Tomography Features and Post- Surgery Pathological Risk Grades of the Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Value of CT-Based Texture Analysis in Preoperative Prediction of the Grade of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Compared to Conventional CT Imaging

The correlation analysis between CT features and the malignant risks of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Building CT Radiomics-Based Models for Preoperatively Predicting Malignant Potential and Mitotic Count of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Texture Analysis of CT Images in Predicting Malignancy Risk of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours

[Advances in radiological studies of gastrointestinal stromal tumors].

Association between calcification and risk stratification in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Computed Tomography in the Size Measurement of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Implication to Risk Stratification and "Wait-and-see" Tactics.

Simple Scoring Model Based on Enhanced CT in Preoperative Prediction of Biological Risk of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Study on Malignancy, Staging, and Grading for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors