Negative ions offset cardiorespiratory benefits of PM 2.5 reduction from residential use of negative ion air purifiers
Wei Liu,Jing Huang,Yan Lin,Chaorui Cai,Yan Zhao,Yanbo Teng,Jinhan Mo,Lijun Xue,Li Liu,Wei Xu,Xinbiao Guo,Yinping Zhang,Junfeng Zhang,Junfeng (Jim) Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12728
IF: 6.5539
2020-08-31
Indoor Air
Abstract:<p>Negative ion air purifiers (NIAPs), as a less costly alternative to the HEPA filtration, have been increasingly deployed in China and potentially elsewhere. While reducing indoor concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>), NIAPs generate massive amounts of negative ions that may be of health concern. We performed week‐long interventions with NIAPs in the dormitories of 56 healthy college students living in Beijing. In a randomized order, each student underwent a true and a sham NIAP session. Cardiorespiratory outcomes were measured before and after each session. The use of true NIAPs reduced indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations significantly, while notably increased negative ion levels. Increases in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and negative ion (NI) exposure were independently associated with increased urinary concentration of malondialdehyde, a biomarker of systemic oxidative stress, resulting in a null net effect of NIAP on malondialdehyde. Likewise, no significant net effects of NIAPs were observed for other outcomes indicative of lung function, vascular tone, arterial stiffness, and inflammation. Our findings suggest that negative ions, possibly along with their reaction products with the room air constituents, adversely affect health. The downsides do not support use of NIAPs as a health‐based mitigation strategy to reduce PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure, especially in residences with PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations that are not extremely high.</p>
engineering, environmental,public, environmental & occupational health,construction & building technology