Pulmonary Benefits of Intervention with Air Cleaner among Schoolchildren in Beijing: A Randomized Double-Blind Crossover Study
Xiaoyan Yang,Qin Wang,Feng Han,Bin Dong,Bo Wen,Li Li,Hongjie Ruan,Shaoping Zhang,Jian Kong,Hong Zhi,Chong Wang,Jun Wang,Ming Zhang,Dongqun Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03146
2021-09-07
Abstract:We conducted a crossover study employing air cleaner intervention among 125 schoolchildren aged 9–12 years in a boarding school in Beijing, China. The PM concentrations were monitored, and 27 biomarkers were analyzed. We used the linear mixed-effects model to evaluate the association of intervention/time-weighted PM concentrations with biomarkers. The outcomes showed that air cleaner intervention was associated with FeNO, exhaled breath condensate (EBC) IL-1β, and IL-6, which decreased by 12.57%, 10.83%, and 4.33%, respectively. Similar results were observed in the associations with PMs. Lag 1 day PMs had the strongest relationship with biomarkers, and significant changes were observed in biomarkers such as FEV1, FeNO, EBC 8-iso, and MCP-1. Boys showed higher percentage changes than girls, and the related biomarkers were FeNO, EBC 4-HNE, IL-1β, IL-6, and MCP-1. The results showed that biomarkers such as FeNO, EBC IL-6, MCP-1, and 4-HNE could sensitively reflect the early abnormal response of the respiratory system under short-term PM exposure among healthy schoolchildren and indicated that (1) air cleaners exert a protective effect on children's respiratory system. (2) PM had lag and cumulative effect, lag 1 day had the greatest effect. (3) The boys were more sensitive than the girls.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c03146.Figure S1 shows the percentage changes and 95% CI in pulmonary function (A), inflammation, and oxidative stress biomarkers in EBC (B) for each 10 μg/m3 decrease of PM10, PM2.5–10, PM2.5, PM1–2.5, and PM1. Figure S2 shows percentage changes of pulmonary functions in analysis of lag and cumulative effects of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1. Figure S3 shows percentage changes of inflammation and oxidative stress biomarkers in analysis of lag and cumulative effects of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1. Figures S4, S5, and S6 show percentage changes among boys and girls between real and sham purification, per 10 μgm3 decrease of PM2.5 and PM10, respectively. Table S1 show sensitivity analysis that replaced BMI with height and weight, and replaced "temperature + relative humidity" with "ns(temperature, 3)+ns(relative humidity, 3)" (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental