Abstract:Abstract Background and Aims At its start, Peritoneal dialysis (PD) was implemented only in advanced renal disease with a myriad of symptoms and signs. However, many subsequent literatures have highlighted possible benefits of early rather than late start of PD. Nevertheless, when to start PD has been a matter of controversy. This debate has created a new era of starting dialysis early during the course of the disease, in a small dose that was termed ‘incremental’ dialysis. By this modality, the dose of PD, is low at the initiation of RRT, and could be progressively increased over time in parallel with the reduction of RKF. Although incremental dialysis is growing worldwide, there has been no substantial agreement on the benefits of this approach. Moreover, the few available observational studies have compared incremental versus full-dose PD, with controversial results. On the other hand, studies comparing incremental dialysis with the conservative management for non-symptomatic ESRD patients are mostly deficient in the published literature. The present work is a retrospective, case-control, longitudinal study, aimed to evaluate the adequacy of incremental peritoneal dialysis as a modality of renal replacement therapy in ESRD patients, and whether it adds superior benefits over the conservative and the standard peritoneal dialysis (STPD) managements. Method Data were collected retrospectively from Complesso Integrato Columbus Policlinico Gemelli, nephrology and dialysis unit archives. The study comprising three groups: first included 23 patients who were treated with IPD and second group included 30 patients who were managed with the standard dose of PD (STPD), and a third group include 19 ESRD patients who had GFR values of < 15ml/min and were off dialysis and received only conservative treatment. The collected data for each patient included demographic, clinical assessment (volume excess and nutritional state), pharmacological data, laboratory records (Hb concentration, and sodium, potassium, phosphorus), creatinine clearance and rate of hospitalization, in addition to dialysis regimen and rate of dialysis related infection in IPD and STPD patients, data from these patients were collected at the baseline (time just before starting PD), and every 6 months for 24 months or whenever there is cessation of PD, whichever occurs first. Results In the present study all IPD group patients started PD with increment dose 1 or 2 exchanges per day, with a solution volume 1.5 to 2 L/ exchange for 8 to 16 hours/day. Data analysis revealed improvement in the nutritional state, a better control of the blood electrolyte and body volume in IPD and STPD groups while they deteriorated significantly in the conservative group (P = 0.005, P = 0.001 & P = 0.001, respectively). Dialysis groups succeed in maintain the Hb level within target level with smaller dose of ESA therapy and also ESA Resistive Index (ERI) decreased in this groups while it significantly increased in the conservative group (P1 = 0.019).There was no statistically significant differences between the rate of decline of creatinine clearance between the patients on conservative, those on IPD and STPD (P = 0.295), Also there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of hospitalization between study groups (P = 0.69).Those who had a mean creatinine clearance (CrCl) more than 9.4±2.8 ml/min/1.73m2 could be managed with one exchange to achieve the target Kt/V, a mean CrCl of less than 3.6±0.8 ml/min/1.73m2 failed to reach adequacy even with two exchanges a day and needed to be transferred to full dose while those with a mean CrCl in between the above values could only achieve Kt/V above 1.7 with two exchanges per day. Conclusion Incremental peritoneal dialysis, a rapidly growing new modality, is superior to the conservative treatment in patients with end-stage renal disease that can be adequately applied to patients with a GFR of 4 ml/min or more without adding the burden of full dose dialysis.

Are USPD Patients Suitable for Incremental Peritoneal Dialysis: Yes or No?

#5231 INCREMENTAL PERITONEAL DIALYSIS VERSUS CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH ESRD

[Effects of Interim Hemodialysis on Survival and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Maintenance Peritoneal Dialysis].

Incremental peritoneal dialysis

Impacts of Baseline Peritoneal Transport Characteristics and Their Changes During Follow Up on the Survival of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Feasibility of a break-in period of less than 24 hours for urgent start peritoneal dialysis: a multicenter study

Immediate-start peritoneal dialysis without break-in-period: an 18-year retrospective cohort study on patient survival

Complications and outcomes of urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in elderly patients with end-stage renal disease in China: a retrospective cohort study

A Fast Decline of Residual Renal Function in the First Year is a Predictor for Early Withdrawal from Peritoneal Dialysis in Non-Diabetic Patients.

Comparison of outcomes of incremental vs. standard peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Unveiling the Intricacies: Exploring Stepwise Initiation of Peritoneal Dialysis in a Single-Center Setting

Complications and Prognosis of Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis and Urgent-Start Hemodialysis in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients

Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis for patients with end stage renal disease: a 10-year retrospective study

Hemodialysis or Peritoneal Dialysis, Which Is Better for Patients with Delayed Graft Function?

Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis in ESRD Patients: Complications and Outcomes

Rapid Initiation of Peritoneal Dialysis by Automated Peritoneal Dialysis or Hemodialysis: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Feasibility of Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis in Older Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Single-Center Experience.

Prognostic comparison of patients starting peritoneal dialysis within two weeks and more than two weeks after catheter implantation

Automated Peritoneal Dialysis in Urgent-Start Dialysis ESRD Patients: Safety and Dialysis Adequacy.

Short-term peritoneal rest reduces peritoneal solute transport rate and increases ultrafiltration in high/high average transport peritoneal dialysis patients: a crossover randomized controlled trial

Analysis of mechanical complications in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis