Feasibility of a break-in period of less than 24 hours for urgent start peritoneal dialysis: a multicenter study

Xi Wen,Liming Yang,Zhanshan Sun,Xiaoxuan Zhang,Xueyan Zhu,Wenhua Zhou,Xiaoqing Hu,Shichen Liu,Ping Luo,Wenpeng Cui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022x.2022.2049306

IF: 3.222

2022-03-10

Renal Failure

Abstract:PURPOSE: Urgent start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) is an effective therapeutic method for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, whether it is safe to initiate peritoneal dialysis (PD) within 24 h unclear. We examined the short-term outcomes of a break-in period (BI) of 24 h for patients undergoing USPD.METHODS: This real-world, multicenter, retrospective cohort study evaluated USPD patients from five centers from January 2013 to August 2020. Patients were divided into BI ≤ 24 h or BI &gt; 24 h groups. The Primary outcomes included incidence of mechanical and infectious complications. The secondary outcome was technique failure. Moreover, we presented a subgroup analysis for patients who did not receive temporary hemodialysis (HD).RESULTS: A total of 871 USPD patients were included: 470 in the BI ≤ 24 h and 401 in the BI &gt; 24 h groups. Mechanical and infectious complications did not differ between the two groups across the follow-up timepoints (2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months) (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that BI ≤ 24 h was not an independent risk factor for mechanical complications, catheter migration, or infectious complications (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). A BI ≤ 24 h was not an independent significant risk factor for technique failure by multivariate Cox regression analysis (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The subgroup analysis of patients who did not receive temporary HD returned the same results.CONCLUSION: Initiating PD within 24 h of catheter insertion was not associated with increased mechanical complications, infectious complications, or technique failures.

urology & nephrology