Image quality enhancement of CT hepatic portal venography using dual energy blending with computer determined parameters

Tao Wang,Yuxin Han,Liying Lin,Changlu Yu,Rong Lv,Li Han
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-210967
2022-01-01
Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that using some post-processing methods, such as nonlinear-blending and linear blending techniques, has potential to improve dual-energy computed (DECT) image quality. OBJECTIVE: To improve DECT image quality of hepatic portal venography (CTPV) using a new non-linear blending method with computer-determined parameters, and to compare the results to additional linear and non-linear blending techniques. METHODS: DECT images of 60 patients who were clinically diagnosed with liver cirrhosis were selected and studied. Dual-energy scanning (80 kVp and Sn140 kVp) of CTPV was utilized in the portal venous phase through a dual-source CT scanner. For image processing, four protocols were utilized including linear blending with a weighing factor of 0.3 (protocol A) and 1.0 (protocol B), non-linear blending with fixed blending width of 200 HU and set blending center of 150HU (protocol C), and computer-based blending (protocol D). Several image quality indicators, including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and contrast of hepatic portal vein and hepatic parenchyma, were evaluated using the paired-sample t-test. A 5-grade scale scoring system was also utilized for subjective analysis. RESULTS: SNR of protocols A-D were 9.1 +/- 2.1, 12.1 +/- 3.0, 11.6 +/- 2.8 and 14.4 +/- 3.2, respectively. CNR of protocols A-D were 4.6 +/- 1.3, 8.0 +/- 2.3, 7.0 +/- 2.0 and 9.8 +/- 2.4, respectively. The contrast of protocols A-D were 37.7 +/- 11.6, 91.9 +/- 21.0, 66.2 +/- 19.0 and 107.7 +/- 21.3, respectively. The differences between protocol D and other three protocols were significant (P < 0.01). In subjective evaluation, the modes of protocols A, B, C, and D were rated poor, good, generally acceptable, and excellent, respectively. CONCLUSION: The non-linear blending technique of protocol D with computer-determined blending parameters can help improve imaging quality of CTPV and contribute to a diagnosis of liver disease.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?