Urine Proteomics Identifies Biomarkers for Diabetic Kidney Disease at Different Stages
Guanjie Fan,Tongqing Gong,Yuping Lin,Jianping Wang,Lu Sun,Hua Wei,Xing Yang,Zhenjie Liu,Xinliang Li,Ling Zhao,Lan Song,Jiali He,Haibo Liu,Xiuming Li,Lifeng Liu,Anxiang Li,Qiyun Lu,Dongyin Zou,Jianxuan Wen,Yaqing Xia,Liyan Wu,Haoyue Huang,Yuan Zhang,Wenwen Xie,Jinzhu Huang,Lulu Luo,Lulu Wu,Liu He,Qingshun Liang,Qubo Chen,Guowei Chen,Mingze Bai,Jun Qin,Xiaotian Ni,Xianyu Tang,Yi Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-021-09338-6
2021-01-01
Clinical Proteomics
Abstract:Background Type 2 diabetic kidney disease is the most common cause of chronic kidney diseases (CKD) and end-stage renal diseases (ESRD). Although kidney biopsy is considered as the ‘gold standard’ for diabetic kidney disease (DKD) diagnosis, it is an invasive procedure, and the diagnosis can be influenced by sampling bias and personal judgement. It is desirable to establish a non-invasive procedure that can complement kidney biopsy in diagnosis and tracking the DKD progress. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we collected 252 urine samples, including 134 uncomplicated diabetes, 65 DKD, 40 CKD without diabetes and 13 follow-up diabetic samples, and analyzed the urine proteomes with liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). We built logistic regression models to distinguish uncomplicated diabetes, DKD and other CKDs. Results We quantified 559 ± 202 gene products (GPs) (Mean ± SD) on a single sample and 2946 GPs in total. Based on logistic regression models, DKD patients could be differentiated from the uncomplicated diabetic patients with 2 urinary proteins (AUC = 0.928), and the stage 3 (DKD3) and stage 4 (DKD4) DKD patients with 3 urinary proteins (AUC = 0.949). These results were validated in an independent dataset. Finally, a 4-protein classifier identified putative pre-DKD3 patients, who showed DKD3 proteomic features but were not diagnosed by clinical standards. Follow-up studies on 11 patients indicated that 2 putative pre-DKD patients have progressed to DKD3. Conclusions Our study demonstrated the potential for urinary proteomics as a noninvasive method for DKD diagnosis and identifying high-risk patients for progression monitoring.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?