Urine complement proteins are associated with kidney disease progression of type 2 diabetes in Korean and American cohorts

Donghwan Yun,Sohyun Bae,Yuqian Gao,Lauren Lopez,Dohyun Han,Carrie D Nicora,Tae Youn Kim,Kyung Chul Moon,Dong Ki Kim,Thomas L Fillmore,Yon Su Kim,Avi Z Rosenberg,Weijie Wang,Pinaki Sarder,Wei-Jun Qian,Maryam Afkarian,Seung Seok Han
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.15.24312080
2024-08-17
MedRxiv
Abstract:Background: Mechanisms of progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) are not completely understood. This study uses untargeted and targeted mass spectrometry-based proteomics in two independent cohorts on two continents to decipher the mechanisms of DKD in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We conducted untargeted mass spectrometry on urine samples collected at the time of kidney biopsy from Korean patients with type 2 diabetes and biopsy-proven diabetic nephropathy at Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH-DN cohort; n = 64). These findings were validated using targeted mass spectrometry in urine samples from a Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort subgroup with type 2 diabetes and DKD (CRIC-T2D; n = 282). Urinary biomarkers/pathways associated with kidney disease progression (doubling of serum creatinine, ≥50% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rates, or the development of end-stage kidney disease) were identified. Results: SNUH-DN patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 55 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (interquartile range [IQR], 44-75) and random urine protein-to-creatinine ratio of 3.1 g/g (IQR, 1.7-7.0). Urine proteins clustered into two groups, with cluster 2 having a 4.6-fold greater hazard (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-11.5) of disease progression than cluster 1 in multivariable-adjusted, time-to-event analyses. Proteins in cluster 2 mapped to 10 pathways, four of the top five of which were complement or complement-related. A high complement score, constructed from urine complement protein abundance, was strongly correlated to 4 of 5 histopathologic DN features and was associated with a 2.4-fold greater hazard (95% CI, 1.0-5.4) of disease progression than a low complement score. Targeted mass spectrometry of the CRIC-T2D participants, who had an eGFR of 42 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (IQR, 37-49) and 24-hr urine protein of 0.48 g (IQR, 0.10-1.87), showed that the complement score similarly segregated them into rapid and slow DKD progression groups. In both cohorts, the complement score had a linear association with disease progression. Conclusions: Urinary proteomic profiling confirms the association between the complement pathway and rapid DKD progression in two independent cohorts. These results suggest a need to further investigate complement pathway inhibition as a novel treatment for DKD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?