Abstract:Abstract Background Data sharing is considered a crucial part of modern medical research. Unfortunately, despite its advantages, it often faces obstacles, especially data privacy challenges. As a result, various approaches and infrastructures have been developed that aim to ensure that patients and research participants remain anonymous when data is shared. However, privacy protection typically comes at a cost, e.g. restrictions regarding the types of analyses that can be performed on shared data. What is lacking is a systematization making the trade-offs taken by different approaches transparent. The aim of the work described in this paper was to develop a systematization for the degree of privacy protection provided and the trade-offs taken by different data sharing methods. Based on this contribution, we categorized popular data sharing approaches and identified research gaps by analyzing combinations of promising properties and features that are not yet supported by existing approaches. Methods The systematization consists of different axes. Three axes relate to privacy protection aspects and were adopted from the popular Five Safes Framework: (1) safe data, addressing privacy at the input level, (2) safe settings, addressing privacy during shared processing, and (3) safe outputs, addressing privacy protection of analysis results. Three additional axes address the usefulness of approaches: (4) support for de-duplication, to enable the reconciliation of data belonging to the same individuals, (5) flexibility, to be able to adapt to different data analysis requirements, and (6) scalability, to maintain performance with increasing complexity of shared data or common analysis processes. Results Using the systematization, we identified three different categories of approaches: distributed data analyses, which exchange anonymous aggregated data, secure multi-party computation protocols, which exchange encrypted data, and data enclaves, which store pooled individual-level data in secure environments for access for analysis purposes. We identified important research gaps, including a lack of approaches enabling the de-duplication of horizontally distributed data or providing a high degree of flexibility. Conclusions There are fundamental differences between different data sharing approaches and several gaps in their functionality that may be interesting to investigate in future work. Our systematization can make the properties of privacy-preserving data sharing infrastructures more transparent and support decision makers and regulatory authorities with a better understanding of the trade-offs taken.

Survey on Privacy Protection in Non-Aggregated Data Sharing

Secret Sharing based Secure Regressions with Applications

A Survey of Game Theoretical Privacy Preservation for Data Sharing and Publishing

Scalable and Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing Based on Blockchain

Security and Privacy in Big Data Sharing: State-of-the-Art and Research Directions

Emerging Privacy Issues and Solutions in Cyber-Enabled Sharing Services: From Multiple Perspectives

From distributed machine learning to federated learning: In the view of data privacy and security

Research on Secure Data Circulation Method Based on Blockchain and Privacy Computing

How to share data securely

Non-Interactive and Secure Data Aggregation Scheme for Internet of Things

PD2S: A Privacy-Preserving Differentiated Data Sharing Scheme based on Blockchain and Federated Learning

Dual-Cloud Multi-Secret Sharing Architecture for Privacy Preserving Persistent Computation

An overview of implementing security and privacy in federated learning

Privacy-preserving data sharing infrastructures for medical research: systematization and comparison

Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Algorithms for Big Data Systems

Overview of Federal Learning and Privacy Protection

A privacy preserving federated learning scheme using homomorphic encryption and secret sharing

Federated Medical Learning Framework Based on Blockchain and Homomorphic Encryption

Robust and Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Learning: A Comprehensive Survey

A Survey on Blockchain-Based Federated Learning and Data Privacy

A Secure and Trusted Data Sharing Scheme Based on Blockchain for Government Data