Abstract:Summary Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution to address the challenges posed by data silos and the need for global data fusion. It offers a distributed machine learning framework with privacy‐preserving features, allowing model training without the need to collect user data. However, FL also presents significant security and privacy threats that hinder its widespread adoption. The requirements of privacy and security in FL are inherently conflicting. Privacy necessitates the concealment of individual client updates, while security requires the disclosure of client updates to detect anomalies. While most existing research focused on the privacy and security aspects of FL, very few studies have addressed the compatibility of these two demands. In this work, we aim to bridge this gap by proposing a comprehensive defense scheme that ensures privacy, security, and compatibility in FL. We categorize the existing literature into two key directions: privacy defense and security defense. Privacy defense includes methods based on additive masks, differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, and trusted execution environment, whereas security defense encompasses distance‐, performance‐, clustering‐, and similarity‐based anomaly detection techniques and statistical information‐based anomaly update bypassing techniques when the server is trusted and privacy‐compatible anomaly update detection techniques when the server is not trusted. In addition, this article presents decentralized FL solutions based on blockchain. For each direction, we discuss specific technical solutions, their advantages, and disadvantages. By evaluating various defense methods, we identify the most suitable approach to address the primary challenge of "achieving a secure and robust FL system against malicious adversaries while protecting users' privacy." We then propose a theoretical reference framework for end‐to‐end protection of privacy and security in FL for the key problem, which summarizes the attack surface of FL systems from the client to the server under the security model where the client and server are malicious. Leveraging the strengths and characteristics of existing schemes, our proposed framework integrates multiple techniques to strike a balance between privacy, usability, and efficiency. This framework serves as a valuable reference and provides insights for future work in the field. Finally, we also provide recommendations for future research directions in this field.

Robust and Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Learning: A Comprehensive Survey

Robust and privacy-preserving collaborative training: a comprehensive survey

Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Deep Learning with Unreliable Participants.

A Survey on Collaborative Deep Learning and Privacy-Preserving.

Collaborative Machine Learning: Schemes, Robustness, and Privacy

Privacy preserving and secure robust federated learning: A survey

Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses

An overview of implementing security and privacy in federated learning

Privacy Preservation in Distributed Deep Learning: A Survey on Distributed Deep Learning, Privacy Preservation Techniques Used and Interesting Research Directions.

PPCL: Privacy-preserving collaborative learning for mitigating indirect information leakage

Recent Advances on Federated Learning: A Systematic Survey

From distributed machine learning to federated learning: In the view of data privacy and security

Challenges and future directions of secure federated learning: a survey

Federated Learning Privacy: Attacks, Defenses, Applications, and Policy Landscape - A Survey

SecCL: Securing Collaborative Learning Systems Via Trusted Bulletin Boards.

A Framework for Privacy-Preserving Efficient Collaborative Learning

A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protection

Privacy-preserving Collaborative Learning with Automatic Transformation Search

A Survey of What to Share in Federated Learning: Perspectives on Model Utility, Privacy Leakage, and Communication Efficiency