Abstract:SAGE Open, Volume 13, Issue 4, October-December 2023. The competition between platforms supported by digital technology, to a great extent, affects the structure of the whole industry and the fate of individual enterprises in the industry. For related enterprises, it is very important to clarify the influencing factors of platform competition equilibrium. This paper constructs a game model that includes platforms, suppliers, and the final consumers. We analyze the condition and stability of each equilibrium and the impacts of the characteristics of the core and complementary products on the equilibrium by using the method of evolutionary game. Our results show the following: (1) If the two platforms initially have separate advantages in terms of the number of suppliers or consumers, there will be an equilibrium of the coexistence of the two platforms; otherwise, there will be an equilibrium of single platform dominating. (2) The equilibrium of a single platform dominating is more stable than that of the coexistence of multiple platforms. (3) The equilibrium of coexistence is more easily broken by the occasional shock of increasing or decreasing the number of suppliers than by consumers. (4) Platforms with poor core product quality and a high price for core and complementary products can coexist with other superior platforms only if the former has more consumers and suppliers at the beginning of the competition. This paper not only enriches the research content in the field of platform competition, but also provides new ideas for them to develop appropriate competition strategies in combination with their own conditions.Plain Language SummaryThe Evolutionary Game of Platform CompetitionThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the equilibrium state of platform competition in a dynamic market from a tripartite perspective of platform-supplier-consumer. This paper constructs a game model that includes platforms, suppliers, and the final consumers. We analyze the condition and stability of each equilibrium and the impacts of the characteristics of the core and complementary products on the equilibrium by using the method of evolutionary game. Our results show the following: (1) If the two platforms initially have separate advantages in terms of the number of suppliers or consumers, there will be an equilibrium of the coexistence of the two platforms; otherwise, there will be an equilibrium of single platform dominating. (2) The equilibrium of a single platform dominating is more stable than that of the coexistence of multiple platforms. (3) The equilibrium of coexistence is more easily broken by the occasional shock of increasing or decreasing the number of suppliers than by consumers. (4) Platforms with poor core product quality and a high price for core and complementary products can coexist with other superior platforms only if the former has more consumers and suppliers at the beginning of the competition. This paper not only enriches the research content in the field of platform competition, but also provides new ideas for them to develop appropriate competition strategies in combination with their own conditions. The limitation of this paper is that it does not consider the possibility of having companies enter or exit the industry.

Platform Competition and Interoperability: the Net Fee Model

Insulated Platform Competition

Switching Cost, Network Externality and Platform Competition

Towards a Framework of Digital Platform Competition: A Comparative Study of Monopolistic & Federated Mobile Payment Platforms

Getting More Third-Party Participants on Board: Optimal Pricing and Investment Decisions in Competitive Platform Ecosystems.

Do Workers and Customers Benefit from Competition Between On-Demand Service Platforms?

A Model of Platform Competition in Sharing Economy

Transparency and Control in Platforms for Networked Markets

Platform-Mediated Competition

Platform Competition with Partial Multi-Homing: when Both Same-Side and Cross-Side Network Effects Exist

Regulating Platform Fees under Price Parity

The Efficiency Of Open Access In Platforms For Networked Cournot Markets

When A Platform Competes with Third-Party Sellers in Networked Markets: A Revenue Management Perspective

The Platform Competition with Multihoming on Both Sides in the Omnichannel – —fee or Subsidy?

Platform Competition as Network Contestability

Hybrid Platform Model

Platform market competition with endogenous side decisions

Optional Intermediaries and Pricing Restraints

Price Competition in Multi-Sided Markets

Competition Between Two-Sided Platforms Under Demand and Supply Congestion Effects

Platforms Competition: An Ecosystem-View Analysis Based on Evolutionary Game Theory