Abstract:SAGE Open, Volume 13, Issue 4, October-December 2023. The competition between platforms supported by digital technology, to a great extent, affects the structure of the whole industry and the fate of individual enterprises in the industry. For related enterprises, it is very important to clarify the influencing factors of platform competition equilibrium. This paper constructs a game model that includes platforms, suppliers, and the final consumers. We analyze the condition and stability of each equilibrium and the impacts of the characteristics of the core and complementary products on the equilibrium by using the method of evolutionary game. Our results show the following: (1) If the two platforms initially have separate advantages in terms of the number of suppliers or consumers, there will be an equilibrium of the coexistence of the two platforms; otherwise, there will be an equilibrium of single platform dominating. (2) The equilibrium of a single platform dominating is more stable than that of the coexistence of multiple platforms. (3) The equilibrium of coexistence is more easily broken by the occasional shock of increasing or decreasing the number of suppliers than by consumers. (4) Platforms with poor core product quality and a high price for core and complementary products can coexist with other superior platforms only if the former has more consumers and suppliers at the beginning of the competition. This paper not only enriches the research content in the field of platform competition, but also provides new ideas for them to develop appropriate competition strategies in combination with their own conditions.Plain Language SummaryThe Evolutionary Game of Platform CompetitionThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the equilibrium state of platform competition in a dynamic market from a tripartite perspective of platform-supplier-consumer. This paper constructs a game model that includes platforms, suppliers, and the final consumers. We analyze the condition and stability of each equilibrium and the impacts of the characteristics of the core and complementary products on the equilibrium by using the method of evolutionary game. Our results show the following: (1) If the two platforms initially have separate advantages in terms of the number of suppliers or consumers, there will be an equilibrium of the coexistence of the two platforms; otherwise, there will be an equilibrium of single platform dominating. (2) The equilibrium of a single platform dominating is more stable than that of the coexistence of multiple platforms. (3) The equilibrium of coexistence is more easily broken by the occasional shock of increasing or decreasing the number of suppliers than by consumers. (4) Platforms with poor core product quality and a high price for core and complementary products can coexist with other superior platforms only if the former has more consumers and suppliers at the beginning of the competition. This paper not only enriches the research content in the field of platform competition, but also provides new ideas for them to develop appropriate competition strategies in combination with their own conditions. The limitation of this paper is that it does not consider the possibility of having companies enter or exit the industry.

Platform Competition as Network Contestability

Platform-Mediated Competition

Platform market competition with endogenous side decisions

Insulated Platform Competition

Transparency and Control in Platforms for Networked Markets

Platforms Competition: An Ecosystem-View Analysis Based on Evolutionary Game Theory

Platform Competition and Interoperability: the Net Fee Model

On the Role of a Market Maker in Networked Cournot Competition

Competition Between Manufacturers and Sharing Economy Platforms: an Owner Base and Sharing Utility Perspective

Do Workers and Customers Benefit from Competition Between On-Demand Service Platforms?

Switching Cost, Network Externality and Platform Competition

Understanding platform competition through simulation: a research outline

Dynamic Competitive Strategy of Platforms with Indirect Network Externality

Platform Competition with Partial Multi-Homing: when Both Same-Side and Cross-Side Network Effects Exist

Middlemen and Contestation in Directed Networks

Duopolistic platform competition for revenue and throughput

Platform entry and homing as competitive strategies under cross-sided network effects

Platform Competition: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature

Two-Sided Competition Between On-Demand Service Platforms

Competitor Referral by Platforms.

Searching and Bargaining with Middlemen