Democracy or Optimal Policy: Decision on Income Tax Without Commitment

Youngsoo Jang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3945490

2021-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:How do differences in political and commitment structure of government affect the aggregate economy, inequality, and welfare? I analyze this question, using a calibrated Aiyagari’s (1994) economy with wealth effects of labor supply wherein a flat tax rate and transfers are endogenously determined according to its political and commitment structure. Specifically, I compare four economies: baseline economy, an economy with the optimal tax with commitment in all steady states, an economy with the optimal tax without commitment, and a political economy with sequential voting. I take two main findings. First, the commitment structure leads the government to weigh differently between redistribution and efficiency. A lack of commitment tends to make the government pursue a more redistributive policy at the expense of efficiency. Second, and more notably, given a lack of commitment, the political economy with voting shows a better welfare outcome than the economy with the time-consistent optimal policy. In such a time-consistent policy case, a lack of commitment hinders the government from implementing a more frugal policy desirable in the long run; instead, it cares more for low-income and -wealth households, resulting in a substantial efficient loss. However, in the political economy with voting, the government considers only an interest of the median voter, who is in the middle class and reluctant to take more enormous distortions from a higher tax rate and larger transfers. These findings imply that, in terms of welfare, policies targeting the middle class would possibly be better than those exquisitely designed for the general public.