Optimal Ramsey Capital Income Taxation —A Reappraisal

YiLi Chien,Yi Wen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20955/wp.2017.024

2017-01-01

Abstract:This paper uses a tractable model to address a long-standing problem in the optimal Ramsey capital taxation literature.The tractability of our model enables us to solve the Ramsey problem analytically along the entire transitional path.We show that the conventional wisdom on Ramsey tax policy and its underlying intuition and rationales do not hold in our model and may thus be misrepresented in the literature.We uncover a critical trade off for the Ramsey planner between aggregate allocative efficiency in terms of the modified golden rule and individual allocative efficiency in terms of self-insurance.Facing the trade off, the Ramsey planner prefers issuing debt rather than taxing capital to correct the capital-over-accumulation problem.In particular, the planner always intends to supply enough bonds to relax individuals' borrowing constraints and through which to achieve the modified golden rule by crowding out capital.Public debt is financed by labor income tax as it is less distortionary than capital tax.Thus, capital taxation is not the optimal tool to achieve aggregate allocative efficiency despite over-accumulation of capital.Hence, the optimal capital tax can be zero, positive, or even negative, depending on the Ramsey planner's ability to issue debt.In a Ramsey equilibrium the modified golden rule can fail to hold whenever the government encounters a debt limit.Finally, the desire to relax individuals' borrowing constraints by the planner may lead to an increasing debt accumulation, resulting in a dynamic path featuring no steady state.