Development and Validation of a New Scoring System for the Early Diagnosis of Tuberculous Meningitis in Adults
Yuying LU,Chen ZHANG,Zhongyang HU,Guang YAO,Qinghua ZHANG,Haixia ZHU,Huan YAO,Zhen WANG,Zhi SONG,Ru CHEN,Ding Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-31333/v1
2020-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background The absence of a sufficiently accurate and efficient diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is major obstacle to delayed treatment, and its non-specific clinical manifestations easily mimic the central nervous system infections caused by other causes, including virus, bacteria, and cryptococcus. This study aims to develop and validate a diagnostic score system for TBM in HIV-uninfected adults by simultaneously comparing TBM with viral meningitis (VM), bacterial meningitis (BM), and cryptococcal meningitis (CM). Methods Twenty-nine factors (including clinical, laboratory and imaging) were assessed among 382 patients who satisfied inclusion criteria for TBM (n = 113), VM (n = 143), BM (n = 65) and CM (n = 61). Independent predictors for the diagnosis of TBM were obtained by logistic regression to establish a diagnostic scoring system. The performance of this scoring system was evaluated using a prospective validation cohort. Results Nine factors independently associated with the diagnosis of TBM: symptom duration (10–30 days), systemic symptoms, evidence of extra-central nervous system tuberculosis, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leukocyte count (100-500∗106 /mL), CSF neutrophil proportion (20%-75%), CSF protein (> 1 g/L), low serum sodium (< 137 mmol/L), meningeal enhancement, and brain parenchymal nodules (tuberculomas). The CSF neutrophil proportion was assigned a score of 2 and all other factors were assigned a score of 1. A score of at least five was suggestive of TBM with a sensitivity of 85.8% and a specificity of 87.7%, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.927. When applied prospectively to an additional 72 patients (21 with TBM, 27 with VM, 14 with BM, and 10 with CM), the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC values of this scoring model were 90.5%, 86.3%, 87.5%, and 0.944, respectively. Conclusions For differential diagnosis between TBM and other causes of meningitis (VM,CM and BM), we developed and validated a new weighted scoring system. The application of this scoring system can help diagnose TBM more efficiently in the early stage.