Development and Validation of a Scoring System for Differential Diagnosis of Tuberculosis and Metastatic Tumor in the Spine.

Shuang Cao,Xin Gao,Guangjian Bai,Baoquan Xin,Tao Wang,Jiashi Cao,Kai Lv,Chengzhang Zhu,Xiangzhi Ni,Weiwei Zou,Yejin Zhou,Jianru Xiao,Tielong Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/idr.s298316
2021-01-01
Infection and Drug Resistance
Abstract:Purpose: Spinal tuberculosis (TB) and metastatic tumor (MT) are common diseases with similar manifestations. Although pathological evaluation is the gold standard to confirm diagnosis, performing biopsies in all patients is not feasible. This study is aimed to create a scoring system to facilitate the differential diagnosis of spinal TB and MT before invasive procedures. Methods: Altogether, 447 patients with spinal TB (n=198) and MT (n=249) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were randomly assigned at 2:1 ratio to a training cohort and a validation cohort. Clinical, laboratory, and radiological diagnostic factors were identified by chi(2) and multiple logistic regression analyses. The scoring system was then established based on the identified independent diagnostic factors scored by regression coefficient beta value, with the cut-off value being determined by ROC curve. The sensitivity and specificity of the system was calculated by comparing the predicted diagnosis with their actual pathological diagnosis. Results: This scoring system was composed of 5 items: pain worsens at night (0 or 2 points), CRP value (0 or 3 points), tumor marker values (0 or 2 points), skip lesions (0 or 3 points), and intervertebral space destruction (0 or 3 points). Patients scoring higher than 7.5 could be diagnosed as spinal TB, otherwise, MT. According to the internal validation, the sensitivity and specificity of the system were 87.9% and 91.6%, respectively. Conclusion: This study established and validated a scoring system which could be used to differentiate spinal TB from MT, thus helping clinicians in quick and accurate differential diagnosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?