Differentiation of Tuberculosis and Metastatic Cancer in the Spine Using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI

Ning LANG,Minying SU,J Hon,Huishu YUAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2015.05.013
2015-01-01
Abstract:PurposeTo investigate the significance of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in differential diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis and metastatic cancer.Materials and Methods DCE-MRI was performed in 46 patients, including 24 cases of TB and 22 cases of metastatic cancer. The characteristic DCE parameters including time-signal intensity curve, signal intensity amplification, and maximum slope were calculated. The two-compartmental pharmacokinetic model was used to obtain Ktrans and kep.Results Of 24 cases of TB, only 1 case (4.2%) showed the wash-out kinetic pattern, 12 cases (50.0%) showed the plateau pattern, and 11 cases (45.8%) showed the persistent enhancing pattern. Of 22 cases of metastatic cancers, 12 cases (54.5%) showed wash-out kinetic pattern, 7 cases (31.8%) showed plateau pattern, and 3 cases (13.6%) showed persistent enhancing pattern. Compared to the metastatic cancer group, the TB group was not statistic different in peak signal enhancement [(198±81)%vs. (165±60)%, P>0.05], maximum slope [(100±55)%vs. (111±41)%,P>0.05] and Ktrans[(0.077±0.036)/minvs. (0.077±0.028)/min,P>0.05]. The TB group had a lower kep when compared with the metastatic cancer group [(0.270±0.015)/minvs. (0.490±0.230)/min,t=38.74,P<0.001]. Conclusion DCE-MRI may provide additional information for differential diagnosis when the manifestations of spinal TB and metastasis were similar or atypical.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?