Efficacy of active rapid molecular screening and IPC interventions to reduce carbapenem-resistant  Enterobacteriaceae infections in emergency intensive care unit – a prospective, multi-stage study

Wenjuan Wu,Simin Yang,Lihua He,Ke Li,Xiaoyu Yu,Lijun Ni,Liang Hu,Jian Guo,Ewelina Biskup,Lunxian Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.16260/v1
2019-01-01
Abstract:Background: To investigate whether molecular rapid active screening and infection-prevention and control(IPC)interventions can reduce the colonization and infection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in a general emergency intensive care unit (EICU). Methods: The study was designed as a before-and-after quasi-experiment. It was conducted in 3 stages. During stage 1, April 2018, the environment was prepared and the staff in EICU was trained. Stage 2 was the main experimental stage from May 2018 to January 2019. The active screening was tested by semi-nested real-time fluorescent PCR (polymerase chain reaction) detection with rectal swabs from all the patients on admission to EICU and the results would be feedback in 1 hour and other IPC interventions were conducted in strict supervision in this stage. In the last stage (stage 3), February 2019-April 2019, only active screening was strictly executed. Other IPC interventions were carried out by health workers without supervision. In the meantime, the atient information and culture results from clinical laboratory from January 2017-April 2019 were collected. Results: In this 1-year study, a total of 217 patients were enrolled. There were 23.04% of the patients were initially colonized or infected with CRE as tested by active molecular screening. The clinical culture detection rate of CRE colonization/infection was 3.37% during the baseline stage (before this study was carried out), from January 2017-March 2018. The rate decreased significantly to 1.20% (p<0.05) during the main experimental period in which active screening and IPC intervention were executed strictly. However, the rate increased again to 6 .12% in stage 3 in which only active screening were carried out in supervision. Based on the clinical characteristics of the EICU patients, we found there's a higher probability that the patients had invasive devices or skin-barrier damage on admission or had antibiotic use before admission were colonized or infected with CRE (p<0.05). Conclusions : Rapid active screening by molecular detection and other IPC interventions conducted in supervision showed a significant reduction of CRE in nosocomial infection. The key to reduce the spread of CRE in the EICU is that all medical staff and healthcare workers execute IPC interventions strictly.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?