Active screening of CRE in intensive care unit and its effect

Mei-lian CHEN,Shou-jun WANG,Ji-qiu KUANG,Rong LIU,Dong-mei LI,Yun-xiao HAO,Yu-long CAO,Yan GAO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11816/cn.ni.2017-172535
2017-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of active screening of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) combined with intensive intervention on prevention of nosocomial infections in intensive care unit (ICU) so as to provide scientific basis for prevention and control of CRE nosocomial infections.METHODS The patients who were hospitalized the ICU from Jun 1, 2016 to Apr 30, 2017 were chosen as the intervention group, the active screening of CRE was carried out for the patients when they were transferred or admitted;the patients who were hospitalized the ICU from Jan 1, 2016 to May 31, 2016 and did not receive the active screening of CRE were assigned as the control group.The bacterial culture was conducted for the patients in the control group by clinicians based on the illness condition.The real-time surveillance of nosocomial infections was carried out for the two groups of patients, and the contact isolation measures were taken for the patients with positive CRE culture.The change of incidence of CRE nosocomial infections was compared by means of chi-square test before and after the active screening.RESULTS A total of 2327 hospitalized ICU patients were monitored, including 1596 patients in the intervention group and 731 patients in the control group.The rate of active screening of CRE was 68.23% (1089/1596) during the intervention period, the colonization rate of active screening of CRE was 4.22% (46/1089);the colonization rate of rectal CRE was the highest (10.90%, 41/376).Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains were dominant among the pathogens, accounting for 84.78%(39/46).The incidence of CRE nosocomial infections was 0.99% (23/2327) during the stud period, CRKP strains were dominant among the pathogens causing nosocomial infections, accounting for 86.96% (20/23).The incidence of CRE nosocomial infection was 0.69% in the intervention group after the active screening interventions were taken, significantly lower than 1.64% in the control group.CONCLUSION The CRKP strains are dominant among the colonized CRE strains, the colonization rate of rectal CRE is high, and the active screening may effectively control the CRE nosocomial infections in the ICU.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?