Clinical Analysis of 208 Cases of Pn1 Staged Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma with or Without Neck Post-Operation Radiotherapy after High-Quality Neck Dissection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Jia Wang,Xuan Su,Xing Zhang,Wenkuan Chen,Zhongyuan Yang,Xiyuan Li,Jingtao Chen,Ying Zhang,Shuwei Chen,Ming Song
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3552861
2020-01-01
Abstract:Background: The significance of post-operation radiotherapy (PORT) for the neck of pN1 staged head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after high-quality neck dissection is unclear. It remains to be further explored. Method: A total of 208 patients with HNSCC treated at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2014 were enrolled in the current study. Among them, 79 patients received PORT for the neck, while 129 did not. All patients were followed up over 5 years, with a median follow-up of 64.6 months. The primary endpoint was 5-year regional recurrence free survival (RRFS), while the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). Result: The RRFS of the PORT group and non-PORT group were 54.4% (95% CI, 0.432-0.657) and 50.4% (95% CI, 0.416-0.591) (P = .668), respectively. The OS were 58.2% (95% CI, 0.471-0.693) and 58.1% (95% CI, 0.495-0.668) (P = 1.000), respectively. The DMFS were 57.0% (95% CI, 0.458-0.681) and 55.0% (95% CI, 0.463-0.637) (P = .886), respectively. The median time of RRFS was 62.0 months in the PORT group and 60.5 months in the non-PORT group (P = .765). The median time of OS was 62.1 months in the PORT group and 65.3 months in the non-PORT group (P = .716). The median time of DMFS was 62.0 months in the PORT group and 62.2 months in the non-PORT group (P = .736). There were no statistical differences in all results. Conclusion: PORT for the neck of pN1 staged HNSCC after high-quality neck dissection did not improve regional control nor overall survival.Funding Statement: The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81672671 and No. 81802713).Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.Ethics Approval Statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. All cases involved in the study consented to participate and the informed consent obtained was written
What problem does this paper attempt to address?