Effect of Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With pIIIA-N2 Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer After Complete Resection and Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Zhouguang Hui,Yu Men,Chen Hu,Jingjing Kang,Xin Sun,Nan Bi,Zongmei Zhou,Jun Liang,Jima Lv,Qinfu Feng,Zefen Xiao,Dongfu Chen,Yan Wang,Junling Li,Jie Wang,Shugeng Gao,Luhua Wang,Jie He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1910
IF: 33.006
2021-08-01
JAMA Oncology
Abstract:ImportanceThe role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) has not been well defined in resected pIIIA-N2 non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of PORT using modern techniques on survival and safety in patients with pIIIA-N2 NSCLC after complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe PORT-C randomized clinical trial was conducted in 394 patients with pIIIA-N2 NSCLC treated with complete resection and 4 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy between January 2009 and December 2017. Data were analyzed between March 2019 and December 2020.InterventionsPatients were randomized equally into the PORT arm (n = 202) or the observation arm (n = 192). The total dose of PORT was 50 Gy.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence–free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis–free survival, and toxic effects.ResultsIn total, 394 patients were enrolled and 364 were eligible, with a median (range) age of 55 (25-70) years. There were 202 (55.5%) male and 162 (44.5%) female patients. The median follow-up was 46.0 (95% CI, 41.9-51.4) months, and 230 DFS events were reported. There were 184 patients in the PORT arm and 180 patients in the observation arm. The 3-year DFS rates were 40.5% with PORT vs 32.7% with observation (median, 22.1 vs 18.6 months), and the difference in DFS was not statistically significant without adjustment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.65-1.09;P = .20), though it was significant with preplanned yet exploratory analysis (stratified analysis by the number of detected lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes, HR, 0.75; log-rankP = .04). The 3-year OS rates were 78.3% vs 82.8% (HR, 1.02;P = .93), and LRFS was 66.5% vs 59.7% (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.97;P = .03), respectively. For 310 per-protocol patients (140 with PORT and 170 with observation), PORT significantly improved DFS (42.8% vs 30.6%; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-1.00;P = .05) but not OS (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.53-1.30;P = .41). The 3-year local recurrence only rates were 9.5% and 18.3% in the 2 arms, respectively (Fine-Gray HR, 0.55; Gray testP = .04). No radiotherapy-related grade 4 or 5 adverse event was observed.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this phase 3 randomized clinical trial of patients with pIIIA-N2 NSCLC after complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy, PORT did not improve DFS. Further studies exploring patients who might best benefit from PORT are needed.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT00880971
oncology