Comparative Evaluation of Keyhole Technique and Delta Technique for Cervical Disc Herniation: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Tong Yu,Jiu-Ping Wu,Jun Zhang,Hai-Chi Yu,Qinyi Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.21246/v1
2020-01-01
Abstract:Background p-PECD is an effective strategy for cervical diseases which working cannula ranges from 3.7 mm to 6.9 mm. However, no studies were performed to compare the clinical outcomes of keyhole technique (diameter of 3.7 mm) and delta technique (diameter of 6.9 mm) in CDH patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of unilateral cervical disc herniation (CDH) patients treated with posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (p-PECD) applying the keyhole technique with those treated with the delta technique.Methods From January 2016 to June 2018, totally 28 consecutive patients presented with single-level CDH who received p-PECD using the keyhole technique or the delta technique were enrolled in this study. Patients were evaluated neurologically pre- and postoperatively. The clinical outcomes, including the operation time, the hospitalization, the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the modified MacNab criteria, were evaluated. Cervical fluoroscopy, CT, and MRI were performed during follow up.Results In both groups, faster “V” point identification, more quickly overlying soft tissue removal and laminoforaminotomy, and shorter operative time, were found in the delta group. Postoperatively, the VAS and MacNab scores of the two techniques were improved significantly. Nevertheless, the differences between the two groups were not significant (P>0.05). One case suffered nerve root outer membrane torn in delta group.Conclusion Both keyhole technique and delta technique are effective methods for CDH in selected patients, and there is no significant difference in clinical outcomes. Delta technology is superior to keyhole technology in the efficiency of “V” point identification, overlying soft tissue removal and spinal cord injury prevention. Furthermore, delta technology is inferior to keyhole technology in anterior decompression of the intervertebral foramen.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?