Abstract:Objective To systematically summarize the criteria, risk factors and clinical predictors of high ovarian response, thus providing scientific basis and support for setting judgement and prediction criteria of high ovarian response. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang Data and clinical practice guideline database including National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) and so on, for eligible records from inception to January 2018. Two well-trained reviewers who had full understanding of the study protocol conducted the literature screening, risk of bias assessment and data extraction independently. Then the information of criteria, risk factors were summarized and analyzed, and clinical predictors of high ovarian response were collected. Results Totally 35 records were identified for analysis, including 25 original studies, 8 reviews and 2 Meta-analyses. For criteria of high ovarian response, the most frequently used single indexes were over 15 oocytes retrieved at oocyte pick-up, estradiol level between 14 680 pmol/L and 18 350 pmol/L on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection, or ovarian sensitivity index (OSI)>10.07/IU. The most common condition in which two or more indexes combined were oocytes retrieved over 15 or 20 and/or peak estradiol concentration on hCG injection day over 11 010 pmol/L. As for risk factors, results from multiple-factor analysis showed that patients with antral follicle count (AFC)≥11, testosterone≥0.299 5 μg/L or peak estradiol≥15.355 μg/L were tend to have high ovarian response. As for clinical predictors, results from cohort studies and reviews showed that the most effective cutoff value for prediction of high ovarian response were anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH)>3.04 μg/L or AMH≥3.12 μg/L, or AFC>14. And studies included in Meta-analysis commonly used AMH>1.59-7.00 μg/L or AFC>9-18 to predict high ovarian response. Moreover, results of Meta-analysis suggested that on basis of age, combing follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), AMH or AFC could improve the performance of prediction. AMH and AFC were better than FSH as predictors of high ovarian response. Combining AMH and AFC to predict high ovarian response would be more accurate than using them separately. Using AFC plus AMH to predict high ovarian response resulted in similar accuracy as using age plus AFC and AMH. Conclusion Current available evidence showed that the most commonly used criteria were oocytes retrieved over 15 or 20 and/or peak estradiol concentration on hCG injection day over 11 010 pmol/L. AFC≥11, testosterone≥0.299 5 μg/L, peak estradiol≥15.355 μg/L may be risk factors for high ovarian response. Based on age, combing FSH, AMH or AFC could improve the performance of prediction. AMH and AFC were better than FSH as predictors of high ovarian response. Combining AMH and AFC to predict high ovarian response would be more accurate than using them separately. Using AFC plus AMH to predict high ovarian response resulted in similar accuracy as using age plus AFC and AMH. However, there were no uniform criteria worldwide for identifying or predicting high ovarian response, studies applying method such as expert consensus based on current results to set uniform criteria and clinical predictors of high ovarian response are warranted to provide theoretical basis and reference for relative study design and guideline development in the future. Key words: High ovarian response; Fertilization in vitro; Embryo transfer; Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; Predictors; Judgement criteria; Meta-analysis

The Evaluative Effectiveness of a Combined Index Exceeded That of a Single Variable for the Ovarian Reserve and Response of Infertile Women

The Comparison of Evaluative Effectiveness Between Antral Follicle Count/age Ratio and Ovarian Response Prediction Index for the Ovarian Reserve and Response Functions in Infertile Women

Anti-Müllerian hormone for prediction of ovarian response in Chinese infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective, multi-centre, observational study

Evaluating the predictive value of age,AFC and bFSH on ovarian reserve function by receiver operating characteristic analysis

Clinical analysis on 309 cases of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

Clinical Study of Multiple Hormone Levels and Ultrasound Measures in Prediction of Ovarian Reserve

Value of Antral Follicle Count on Predicting the Ovarian Reserve in 5865 Women Undergoing IVF/ICSI-ET

The Predictive Levels of Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone and the Combined Index of the Number of Retrieved Oocytes and Good-Quality Embryos in Advanced-Age Infertile Women.

Criteria and Clinical Predictors of High Ovarian Response: a Systematic Review

Bone morphogenetic protein-15 in follicle fluid combined with age may differentiate between successful and unsuccessful poor ovarian responders

Evaluation of Ovarian Reserve Tests and Age in the Prediction of Poor Ovarian Response to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation—A Real-World Data Analysis of 89,002 Patients

Analysis of the significance of basal follicle stimulating hormone/luteinizing hormone ratio in the assessment of ovarian response

The Status and Comparison of Ovarian Reserve Between Fertile and Infertile Healthy Chinese Women of Reproductive Age

Appraise on the Predictive Indexes of Ovarian Response to Ovarian Hyperstimulation in ART

Prediction of Low Ovarian Response in Infertile Patients of Different Ages Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation

An Ovarian Reserve Assessment Model Based on Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels, Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Levels, and Age: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Multivariate Regression Analysis of the Related Factors of Ovarian Response During in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo-Transfer

Study on the Multi-Factors of Poor Ovarian Response in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo-Transfer

Elevated Follicular Cortisone Level is a Negative Predictor of Clinical Pregnancy in Women Undergoing Fresh Embryo Transfer

Study of predictive indicators and pregnancy outcome of poor ovarian response in controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation

Evaluation of index used for prediction of ovary response in controlled ovarian stimulation