Evaluating the predictive value of age,AFC and bFSH on ovarian reserve function by receiver operating characteristic analysis

Wang Junxia,Sun Haixiang,Wang Bin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2011.10.009
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the predictive value of age,AFC and bFSH on ovarian reserve function in women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.Methods:6387 long protocol IVF/ICSI-ET cycles from Jan.2003 to Dec.2009 were analyzed retrospectively by ROC curve.Results:(1)The areas under ROC curve(AUC)of age,AFC and bFSH for predicting the poor response rate were 0.69(AUCl),0.86(AUC2),and 0.70(AUC3)respectively,which were all larger than the areas under the diagnosis reference line(P<0.05).AUC2 was significantly larger than AUCl and AUC3(Z12=9.43,Z23=8.21,P<0.05),and there was no significant difference between AUCl and AUC3(Z13=0.35,P>0.05).(2)The AUC of age,AFC and bFSH for predicting the clinical pregnancy rate were 0.57(AUC4),0.55(AUC5),and 0.53(AUC6)respectively,which were all larger than those under the diagnosis reference line(P<0.05).AUC4 was significantly larger than AUC5 and AUC6(Z45=2.21,Z46=3.98,P<0.05),and there was no significant difference between AUC5 and AUC6(Z56=1.77,P>0.05).(3)AUCl,AUC2 and AUC3 were separately larger than AUC4,AUC5,and AUC6(Z14=7.18,Z25=24.75,Z36=9.31,P<0.05).Conclusions:Age,bFSH and AFC are all valuable in prediction of ovarian reserve function,whereas AFC achieves the better value in predicting ovarian response than age and bFSH.Age is better at predicting the clinical pregnancy than AFC and bFSH.Age,AFC and bFSH are better at predicting the poor response to gonadotrophin stimulation than the chance of pregnancy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?