Timing Assessment of Response to Fluid Challenge in Patients with Septic Shock

Hui-bin Huang,Biao Xu,Guang-Yun Liu,Bin Du
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1042950/v1
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objectives: Fluid challenge (FC) is most commonly used for fluid responsiveness (FR) evaluation, with a wide divergence in assessment time choices. Therefore, we aimed to explore the optimal assessment time for FC in patients with septic shock. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted. Septic shock patients who had experienced initial resuscitation and required an FC with 500 mL 4% gelatin or normal saline (NS) over 5-10 min were included. FR was defined by an increase in cardiac index (CI) >10%. FR and other predefined variables were recorded at baseline (Tb), immediately (T0), and at 10 (T1), 30 (T2), 45 (T3), 60 (T4), 90 (T5), and 120 (T6) min after FC. The incidence of FR and hemodynamic variables at predefined time points were recorded. Data were analyzed by repeated measures of analysis of variance. Results: 63 patients were enrolled, with 43 in the gelatin group and 20 in the NS group. Among the 45/63 (71%) responders, 31 were responded at T0 (ER), while 14 responded at T1 or later (LR). The proportion of NR, ER and LR was comparable between gelatin and NS groups. After FC, the time course of FR status was slightly different between gelatin and NS groups. In the gelatin group, FC induced most responders (69%, 31/45) and frequency of CI maximum (35%, 11/31) at T2 and sustained a positive FR status until T4; while in the NS group, FC induced most responders (55%, 11/20) and frequency of CI maximum (64%, 9/14) at T1, and sustained FR status until T1. Conclusions: Different time courses of FR were found between gelatin and NS group patients undergoing FC. Thus, when NS is used, FR should be performed within 10 min, while it is better to extend the assessment time to 30 min after FC when gelatin is used.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?