Abstract:Abstract Background Early intravenous fluids for patients with sepsis presenting with hypoperfusion or shock in the emergency department remains one of the key recommendations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines to reduce mortality. However, compliance with the recommendation remains poor. While several interventions have been implemented to improve early fluid administration as part of sepsis protocols, the extent to which they have improved compliance with fluid resuscitation is unknown. The factors associated with the lack of compliance are also poorly understood. Methods We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative review to investigate the effectiveness of interventions in emergency departments in improving compliance with early fluid administration and examine the non-interventional facilitators and barriers that may influence appropriate fluid administration in adults with sepsis. We searched MEDLINE Ovid/PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL, and SCOPUS databases for studies of any design to April 2021. We synthesised results from the studies reporting effectiveness of interventions in a meta-analysis and conducted a narrative synthesis of studies reporting non-interventional factors. Results We included 31 studies out of the 825 unique articles identified in the systematic review of which 21 were included in the meta-analysis and 11 in the narrative synthesis. In meta-analysis, interventions were associated with a 47% improvement in the rate of compliance [(Random Effects (RE) Relative Risk (RR) = 1.47, 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.25–1.74, p -value < 0.01)]; an average 24 min reduction in the time to fluids [RE mean difference = − 24.11(95% CI − 14.09 to − 34.14 min, p value < 0.01)], and patients receiving an additional 575 mL fluids [RE mean difference = 575.40 (95% CI 202.28–1353.08, p value < 0.01)]. The compliance rate of early fluid administration reported in the studies included in the narrative synthesis is 48% [RR = 0.48 (95% CI 0.24–0.72)]. Conclusion Performance improvement interventions improve compliance and time and volume of fluids administered to patients with sepsis in the emergency department. While patient-related factors such as advanced age, co-morbidities, cryptic shock were associated with poor compliance, important organisational factors such as inexperience of clinicians, overcrowding and inter-hospital transfers were also identified. A comprehensive understanding of the facilitators and barriers to early fluid administration is essential to design quality improvement projects. PROSPERO Registration ID CRD42021225417.

Relationship Between Fluid Administration During the First Three Hours of Sepsis Resuscitation and Mortality: A Multicenter Observational Study

The Effect of Fluid Resuscitation Timing in Early Sepsis Resuscitation

Evaluation and Predictors of Fluid Resuscitation in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

Albumin Versus Other Fluids For Fluid Resuscitation In Patients With Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis

Assessment of outcomes in patients with heart failure and end-stage kidney disease following fluid resuscitation for sepsis and septic shock

Fluid boluses and infusions in the early phase of resuscitation from septic shock and sepsis-induced hypotension: a retrospective report and outcome analysis from a tertiary hospital

Effect of Fluid Resuscitation on Adhesion Molecule and Hemodynamics in Patients with Severe Sepsis

Moderate IV Fluid Resuscitation Is Associated With Decreased Sepsis Mortality

Influence of fluid balance on the prognosis of patients with sepsis

Individualized Fluid Administration for Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis with an Interpretable Dynamic Treatment Regimen Model

Outcomes of CMS-mandated fluid administration among fluid-overloaded patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Associations Between Volume of Early Intravenous Fluid and Hospital Outcomes in Septic Patients With and Without Heart Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Relationship between the rate of fluid resuscitation and acute kidney injury: A retrospective cohort study

Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-guided Fluid Resuscitation of Sepsis-Induced Hypoperfusion and Septic Shock

Increased 28‐day mortality due to fluid overload prior to continuous renal replacement in sepsis associated acute kidney injury

Positive fluid balance and poor outcomes after initial intensive care unit admission in sepsis resuscitation: a retrospective study

INITIATION TIMING OF VASOPRESSOR IN PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Hemodynamic Resuscitation Characteristics of Emergency Department Patients with Sepsis and Hypotension who are and are not Admitted to ICU; a Prospective Cross-sectional Study

Restrictive resuscitation in patients with sepsis and mortality: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis

Early fluid bolus in adults with sepsis in the emergency department: a systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis

Practice and effect evaluation of early restrictive fluid resuscitation strategy in the nursing care of patients with sepsis in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study