Evaluation of the Benefits of ATF, FLEX, and Passive Cooling System for an Enhanced Resilient PWR Model

Zhegang Ma,Cliff Davis,Carlo Parisi,Ronald Boring PhD,Sai Zhang,Hongbin Zhang,Ryan Dailey,Jun Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2172/1777262
2019-01-01
Abstract:This report, along with report INL/EXT-19-53556, documents the activities performed by Idaho National Laboratory (INL) during the fiscal year (FY) 2019 for the DOE Light Water Reactor Sustainability (LWRS) Program, Risk-Informed System Analysis (RISA) Pathway, Enhanced Resilient Plant (ERP) Systems research. This report includes additional accident scenarios for risk-informed ATF analysis, and examines the risk impacts of FLEX and passive cooling system on nuclear power plants (NPPs) from additional perspectives. The same analysis process, risk analysis approaches, and analysis tools as in FY 2018 were used for near-term ATF cladding (i.e., Iron-Chromium-Aluminum [FeCrAl] cladding and Chromium [Cr]-coated cladding) designs under the small break loss-of-coolant accident (SBLOCA) scenarios, two types of general transient scenarios (locked rotor and turbine trip), and main steam line break (MSLB) scenarios. Benchmark calculations for ATF analysis using RELAP5-3D and MELCOR are also presented. In addition, based on the generic probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) model, the risk impacts of FLEX and the dynamic natural convection (DNC) system on NPPs are evaluated through a risk-informed decision-making process, i.e., significance determination process (SDP).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?