Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the expiratory resistance (R exp) in different lung mechanics models during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) according to estimated calculation of expiratory time constants (τ E) . Methods:ASL 5000 mechanical lung simulator was used to mimic a semi-recumbent subject with a body mass of 65-70 kg, either being a healthy adult or a patient with high airway resistance with or without low thoraco-pulmonary compliance (mixed ventilatory disorder) . The system settings included: compliance (C rs) , 25 (for mixed ventilatory disorder) or otherwise 50 ml/cmH 2O (1 cmH 2O=0.098 kPa) ; R exp, 5 (for healthy adult) or otherwise 20 cmH 2O·L -1·s -1; inspiratory time, 1.6 s; respiratory rate, 15 times/min. The Respironics V60 ventilator was set to operate in S/T mode with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH 2O. Inspiratory pressure was adjusted to maintain a tidal ventilator output (V T) of 5, 7 and 10 ml/kg, respectively, and a backup ventilation frequency of 10 times/min. Ventilation parameters[inspiratory tidal volume (V TI) , expiratory tidal volume (V TE) , system leakage (V leak) , peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) , peak inspiratory flow (PIF) , peak expiratory flow (PEF) and the expiratory flow at 75% expiratory tidal volume (TEF 75) ] were recorded at the V leak level of 25-28 L/min. Thereby τ E, C rs and R exp were estimated and evaluated. Results:With increasing V TI and V TE, V leak, PIP, PIF and PEF gradually increased. At the V T of 10 ml/kg, the PIP in the mixed ventilatory disorder model reached 28 cmH 2O, and the PIF and PEF values in all of the three lung mechanics models were nearly two times higher than those at the V T of 5 ml/kg (all P<0.01) . During expiration, the PEF gradually decreased with the discharge of V TE. When V T was 7-10 ml/kg, there was no statistically significant difference between TEF 75 and PEF (all P>0.01) . The level of V T did not interfere obviously with the calculated τ E value in the high airway resistance model. In all of the three lung mechanics models, the estimated C rs values gradually decreased with increasing V T. Under high airway resistance, the error of calculated C rs value was <20% when the V T was 7 ml/kg. With increasing ventilation support, the measured R exp gradually increased in all of the three lung mechanics models. When the V T was 7 ml/kg, the difference between the measured R exp and the preset value became even lower (<10%) . Conclusion:Estimated calculation of τ E may allow for continuous monitoring of R exp in patients on NPPV support without interference of spontaneous breathing. Proper selection of V T (7 ml/kg) can be the key to reduce the measurement error while ensuring effective ventilation support.

Bench investigation of the accuracy of the dynamic approach in respiratory mechanics during noninvasive ventilation with different pressure support levels

Accuracy of the Dynamic Signal Analysis Approach in Respiratory Mechanics During Noninvasive Pressure Support Ventilation: a Bench Study.

Accuracy of the Estimations of Respiratory Mechanics Using an Expiratory Time Constant in Passive and Active Breathing Conditions: a Bench Study

Respiratory System Mechanics During Noninvasive Proportional Assist Ventilation: A Model Study

Continuous Estimation of Airway Resistance in Non-Invasive Ventilation

Comparison Of Inspiratory Effort, Workload And Cycling Synchronization Between Non-Invasive Proportional-Assist Ventilation And Pressure-Support Ventilation Using Different Models Of Respiratory Mechanics

Estimated calculation of expiratory time constants for expiratory resistance evaluation during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation

Continuous estimation of respiratory system compliance and airway resistance during pressure-controlled ventilation without end-inspiration occlusion

Influence of different respiratory mechanics properties on inspiratory flow index during pressure controlled ventilation

Individualized Mechanical Power-Based Ventilation Strategy for Acute Respiratory Failure Formalized by Finite Mixture Modeling and Dynamic Treatment Regimen

Individual response in patient's effort and driving pressure to variations in assistance during pressure support ventilation

Assessment of respiratory system compliance under pressure control ventilation without an inspiratory pause maneuver

Airway and Transpulmonary Driving Pressure by End-Inspiratory Holds During Pressure Support Ventilation

Dynamic lung aeration and strain with positive end-expiratory pressure individualized to maximal compliance versus ARDSNet low-stretch strategy: a study in a surfactant depletion model of lung injury

Pulmonary response prediction through personalized basis functions in a virtual patient model

Virtual patients for mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit

Validation of at-the-bedside formulae for estimating ventilator driving pressure during airway pressure release ventilation using computer simulation

Evaluation of three approaches used for respiratory measurement in healthy subjects

Comparing physiological impacts of positive pressure ventilation versus self-breathing via a versatile cardiopulmonary model incorporating a novel alveoli opening mechanism

Automatic Adjustment of the Inspiratory Trigger and Cycling-Off Criteria Improved Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony During Pressure Support Ventilation

Use of pressure muscle index to predict the contribution of patient’s inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation: a prospective physiological study