Abstract:Importance: Treatment strategies for intermediate coronary lesions guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) have shown comparable outcomes. Identifying low-risk deferred vessels to ensure the safe deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and high-risk revascularized vessels that necessitate thorough follow-up can help determine optimal treatment strategies.Objectives: To investigate outcomes according to treatment types and FFR and IVUS parameters after FFR- or IVUS-guided treatment.Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study included patients with intermediate coronary stenosis from the Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial, an investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial that assigned patients into an IVUS-guided strategy (which recommended PCI for minimum lumen area [MLA] <= 3 mm2 or 3 mm2 to 4 mm2 with plaque burden [PB] >= 70%) or an FFR-guided strategy (which recommended PCI for FFR <= 0.80). Data were analyzed from November to December 2022.Exposures: FFR or IVUS parameters within the deferred and revascularized vessels.Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and revascularization at 2 years.Results: A total of 1619 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.1 [9.6] years; 1137 [70.2%] male) with 1753 vessels were included in analysis. In 950 vessels for which revascularization was deferred, incidence of TVF was comparable between IVUS and FFR groups (3.8% vs 4.1%; P = .72). Vessels with FFR greater than 0.92 in the FFR group and MLA greater than 4.5 mm2 or PB of 58% or less in the IVUS group were identified as low-risk deferred vessels, with a decreased risk of TVF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.25 [95% CI, 0.09-0.71]; P = .009). In 803 revascularized vessels, the incidence of TVF was comparable between IVUS and FFR groups (3.6% vs 3.7%; P = .95), which was similar in the revascularized vessels undergoing PCI optimization (4.2% vs 2.5%; P = .31). Vessels with post-PCI FFR of 0.80 or less in the FFR group or minimum stent area of 6.0 mm2 or less or with PB at stent edge greater than 58% in the IVUS group had an increased risk for TVF (HR, 7.20 [95% CI, 3.20-16.21]; P < .001).Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis, FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies showed comparable outcomes in both deferred and revascularized vessels. Binary FFR and IVUS parameters could further define low-risk deferred vessels and high-risk revascularized vessels.

The Association Between Intravascular Ultrasound-Derived Echo-Attenuation and Quantitative Flow Ratio in Intermediate Coronary Lesions

Diagnostic Performance of Immediate Angiography Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients after Second Generation Drug Eluting Stent and Bioresorable Scaffold Implantation

Prognostic Implications of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Neointimal Characteristics in Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for In-Stent Restenosis

Effect of lesion characteristics on diagnostic performance of CT-derived fractional flow reserve: exploring the indications for application based on CT-FFR CHINA trial (Preprint)

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Immediate Angiography Derived Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio after Bioresorbable Scaffold and Drug Eluting Stent Implantation

Angiographic Lesion Morphology Provides Incremental Value to Generalize Quantitative Flow Ratio for Predicting Myocardial Ischemia

[Association Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Quantitative Coronary Angiography Parameters in Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis].

Prognostic Implications of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Plaque Characteristics in Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Treatment Strategy

Discordance Between Angiographic Assessment and Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasound in Intermediate Coronary Lesions: A Post-hoc Analysis of the FLAVOUR Trial.

Association of Quantitative Flow Ratio with Lesion Severity and Its Ability to Discriminate Myocardial Ischemia

Usefulness of Combined Intravascular Ultrasound Parameters to Predict Functional Significance of Coronary Artery Stenosis and Determinants of Mismatch

Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio in Complex Coronary Lesions

Diagnostic performance of ultrasonic flow ratio versus quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis

Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound Criteria for Defining the Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: an International Multicenter Study.

Predictive value of the QFR in detecting vulnerable plaques in non-flow limiting lesions: a combined analysis of the PROSPECT and IBIS-4 study

Physiology- or Imaging-Guided Strategies for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.

Predictors of vessel quantitative flow ratio loss in patients with severely calcified lesions after rotational atherectomy

Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Parameters Predicting the Functional Significance of Single De Novo Lesions.

Clinical Relevance of Functionally Insignificant Moderate Coronary Artery Stenosis Assessed by 3‐vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement

Diagnostic performance of intravascular ultrasound-based fractional flow reserve in evaluating of intermediate left main stenosis

Optimized Quantitative Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Parameters Predicting the Functional Significance of Single De Novo Lesions in the Left Anterior Descending Artery.