Abstract:Abstract Background The functional severity and morphological features of epicardial lesions are both related to plaque vulnerability and adverse coronary events. However, their relationship remains controversial, especially in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Purpose This study aimed to examine whether quantitative flow ratio (QFR), an angiography-based computation of fractional flow reserve, was associated with optical coherence tomography (OCT)-defined vulnerable plaques such as thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFAs) in a board spectrum of population, including patients presenting stable angina and NSTE-ACS. Methods We identified patients who underwent OCT examinations from 2 prospective cohorts and then assessed interrogated vessels with QFR. Lesions were divided into tertiles: QFR-T1 (QFR <0.85), QFR-T2 (0.85 to 0.93) and QFR-T3 (QFR >0.93). Results This post-hoc analysis included 83 lesions from 79 patients (mean age: 61.5±9.8 years, males: 58%). Patients with NSTE-ACS accounted for the majority of the population (67%). The median % diameter stenosis and median QFR value were 42% (36 to 49%) and 0.88 (0.83 to 0.95), respectively. The prevalence of OCT-TCFA was significantly higher in QFR-T1 (50%) than in QFR-T2 (14%) and QFR-T3 (19%) (p=0.003 and 0.018, respectively). Overall significant differences were observed among tertiles in maximum lipid arc, thinnest fibrous cap thickness (FCT), and minimal lumen area (MLA) (p=0.017, 0.040, and <0.001, respectively). The Spearman's correlation analysis showed that QFR was significantly related to MLA (ρ = 0.537, p<0.001), % area stenosis (ρ = –0.512, p<0.001), maximum lipid arc (ρ = –0.360, p=0.002), lipid length (ρ = –0.242, p=0.038), lipid index (ρ = –0.333, p=0.004), and thinnest FCT (ρ = 0.315, p=0.006). In the multivariable analysis, QFR ≤0.80 remained as a significant determinant of TCFAs regardless of the presence of NSTE-ACS and the level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (adjusted odds ratio = 4.387, 95% confidence interval: 1.297 to 14.839, p=0.017). In addition, QFR demonstrated moderate predictive ability for OCT-TCFA (area under the curve = 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.58 to 0.86, p=0.003) with the best cutoff of ≤0.86 (sensitivity: 65%; specificity: 73%; negative predictive value: 85%; accuracy: 71%). Conclusions Lower QFR was related to OCT-TCFA and other vulnerable plaque characteristics in angiographically mild-to-intermediate stable lesions and culprit lesions from NSTE-ACS. The QFR might be a useful tool for ruling out high-risk, rupture-prone plaques without using any pressure wires or vasodilators. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): The Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program Flow diagram of patient selectionOCT findings according to QFR tertiles

Predictive value of the QFR in detecting vulnerable plaques in non-flow limiting lesions: a combined analysis of the PROSPECT and IBIS-4 study

Prognostic Implications of Comprehensive Whole Vessel Plaque Quantification Using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography

Prognostic Implications of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Plaque Characteristics in Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Treatment Strategy

Outcomes of Non-Ischaemic Coronary Lesions with High-Risk Plaque Characteristics on Coronary CT Angiography

The Association Between Quantitative Flow Ratio and Intravascular Imaging-defined Vulnerable Plaque Characteristics in Patients with Stable Angina and Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Angiographic Lesion Morphology Provides Incremental Value to Generalize Quantitative Flow Ratio for Predicting Myocardial Ischemia

High-Risk Morphological and Physiological Coronary Disease Attributes As Outcome Markers after Medical Treatment and Revascularization.

Prognostic Implications of Plaque Characteristics and Stenosis Severity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Shear Stress Estimated by Quantitative Coronary Angiography Predicts Plaques Prone to Progress and Cause Events

Clinical Implications of Three-Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Usefulness of Combined Intravascular Ultrasound Parameters to Predict Functional Significance of Coronary Artery Stenosis and Determinants of Mismatch

Clinical value of single projection angiography-derived FFR in non-infarct related artery

Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in prospectively enrolled patients: An individual patient-data meta-analysis.

Long-term Prognostic Value of Dynamic Function Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Lesion with Computational Physiology.

The Association Between Intravascular Ultrasound-Derived Echo-Attenuation and Quantitative Flow Ratio in Intermediate Coronary Lesions

Optical Coherence Tomography-Defined Vulnerable Plaque Characteristics in Relation to Functional Severity of Coronary Stenoses Stratified by Quantitative Flow Ratio

Clinical Value of Single-Projection Angiography–Derived FFR in Noninfarct-Related Artery

Clinical prognostic value of a novel quantitative flow ratio from a single projection in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with the provisional approach.

Predictors for Vulnerable Plaque in Functionally Significant Lesions

Prognostic value of plaque volume combined with CT fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

Two birds with one stone: integrated assessment of coronary physiology and plaque vulnerability from a single angiographic view-a case report