Abstract:Metasurfaces, with their superior capability in manipulating the optical wavefront at the subwavelength scale and low manufacturing complexity, have shown great potential for planar photonics and novel optical devices. However, vector field simulation of metasurfaces is so far limited to periodic-structured metasurfaces containing a small number of meta-atoms in the unit cell by using full-wave numerical methods. Here, focusing on achiral meta-atoms only with electric polarizability and thickness far less than the wavelength of light, and ignoring the coupling between meta-atoms, we propose a general phenomenological method to analytically model the metasurfaces based on the assumption that the metaatoms possess localized resonances with Lorentz-Drude forms, whose exact form can be retrieved from the full wave simulation of a single element. Applied to phase modulated geometric metasurfaces constituted by identical meta-atoms with different orientations, our analytical results show good agreement with full-wave numerical simulations. The proposed theory provides an efficient method to model and design optical devices based on metasurfaces. ©2016 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (160.3918) Metamaterials; (090.2890) Holographic optical elements. References and links 1. A. V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, “Planar Photonics with Metasurfaces,” Science 339(6125), 1232009 (2013). 2. N. Yu and F. Capasso, “Flat optics with designer metasurfaces,” Nat. Mater. 13(2), 139–150 (2014). 3. N. Meinzer, W. L. Barnes, and I. R. Hooper, “Plasmonic meta-atoms and metasurfaces,” Nat. Photonics 8(12), 889–898 (2014). 4. M. A. Kats, P. Genevet, G. Aoust, N. Yu, R. Blanchard, F. Aieta, Z. Gaburro, and F. Capasso, “Giant birefringence in optical antenna arrays with widely tailorable optical anisotropy,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109(31), 12364–12368 (2012). 5. S. Jiang, X. Xiong, Y. Hu, Y. Hu, G. Ma, R. Peng, C. Sun, and M. Wang, “Controlling the Polarization State of Light with a Dispersion-Free Metastructure,” Phys. Rev. X 4(2), 021026 (2014). 6. B. Yang, W. M. Ye, X. D. Yuan, Z. H. Zhu, and C. Zeng, “Design of ultrathin plasmonic quarter-wave plate based on period coupling,” Opt. Lett. 38(5), 679–681 (2013). 7. N. Yu, P. Genevet, M. A. Kats, F. Aieta, J. P. Tetienne, F. Capasso, and Z. Gaburro, “Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction,” Science 334(6054), 333–337 (2011). 8. X. Ni, N. K. Emani, A. V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, “Broadband Light Bending with Plasmonic Nanoantennas,” Science 335(6067), 427 (2012). 9. S. Sun, Q. He, S. Xiao, Q. Xu, X. Li, and L. Zhou, “Gradient-index meta-surfaces as a bridge linking propagating waves and surface waves,” Nat. Mater. 11(5), 426–431 (2012). 10. X. Ni, S. Ishii, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, “Ultra-thin, planar, Babinet inverted plasmonic metalenses,” Light Sci. Appl. 2(4), e72 (2013). 11. A. Pors, M. G. Nielsen, R. L. Eriksen, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Broadband Focusing Flat Mirrors Based on Plasmonic Gradient Metasurfaces,” Nano Lett. 13(2), 829–834 (2013). #256678 Received 6 Jan 2016; revised 4 Feb 2016; accepted 9 Feb 2016; published 24 Mar 2016 (C) 2016 OSA 4 Apr 2016 | Vol. 24, No. 7 | DOI:10.1364/OE.24.007120 | OPTICS EXPRESS 7120 12. P. Genevet, N. Yu, F. Aieta, J. Lin, M. A. Kats, R. Blanchard, M. O. Scully, Z. Gaburro, and F. Capasso, “Ultrathin plasmonic optical vortex plate based on phase discontinuities,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100(1), 013101 (2012). 13. J. Lin, P. Genevet, M. A. Kats, N. Antoniou, and F. Capasso, “Nanostructured holograms for broadband manipulation of vector beams,” Nano Lett. 13(9), 4269–4274 (2013). 14. X. Ni, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, “Metasurface holograms for visible light,” Nat. Commun. 4, 2807 (2013). 15. W. T. Chen, K. Y. Yang, C. M. Wang, Y. W. Huang, G. Sun, I. D. Chiang, C. Y. Liao, W. L. Hsu, H. T. Lin, S. Sun, L. Zhou, A. Q. Liu, and D. P. Tsai, “High-efficiency broadband meta-hologram with polarization-controlled dual images,” Nano Lett. 14(1), 225–230 (2014). 16. G. Li, M. Kang, S. Chen, S. Zhang, E. Y. Pun, K. W. Cheah, and J. Li, “Spin-Enabled Plasmonic Metasurfaces for Manipulating Orbital Angular Momentum of Light,” Nano Lett. 13(9), 4148–4151 (2013). 17. X. Yin, Z. Ye, J. Rho, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, “Photonic spin hall effect at metasurfaces,” Science 339(6126), 1405–1407 (2013). 18. N. Shitrit, I. Yulevich, E. Maguid, D. Ozeri, D. Veksler, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, “Spin-optical metamaterial route to spin-controlled photonics,” Science 340(6133), 724–726 (2013). 19. E. Karimi, S. A. Schulz, I. De Leon, H. Qassim, J. Upham, and R. W. Boyd, “Generating optical orbital angular momentum at visible wavelengths using a plasmonic metasurface,” Light Sci. Appl. 3(5), e167 (2014). 20. L. Huang, X. Chen, B. Bai, Q. Tan, G. Jin, T. Zentgraf, and S. Zhang, “Helicity dependent directional surface plasmon polariton excitation using a metasurface with interfacial phase discontinuity,” Light Sci. Appl. 2(3), e70 (2013). 21. J. Lin, J. P. Mueller, Q. Wang, G. Yuan, N. Antoniou, X. C. Yuan, and F. Capasso, “Polarization-controlled tunable directional coupling of surface plasmon polaritons,” Science 340(6130), 331–334 (2013). 22. L. Huang, X. Chen, H. Mühlenbernd, H. Zhang, S. Chen, B. Bai, Q. Tan, G. Jin, K. Cheah, C. Qiu, J. Li, T. Zentgraf, and S. Zhang, “Three-dimensional optical holography using a plasmonic metasurface,” Nat. Commun. 4, 2808 (2013). 23. G. Zheng, H. Mühlenbernd, M. Kenney, G. Li, T. Zentgraf, and S. Zhang, “Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 10(4), 308–312 (2015). 24. Y. Zhao, N. Engheta, and A. Alù, “Homogenization of plasmonic metasurfaces modeled as transmission-line loads,” Metamaterials (Amst.) 5(2-3), 90–96 (2011). 25. Y. Zhao and A. Alù, “Manipulating light polarization with ultrathin plasmonic metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. B 84(20), 205428 (2011). 26. C. Pfeiffer, C. Zhang, V. Ray, L. J. Guo, and A. Grbic, “High performance bianisotropic metasurfaces: Asymmetric transmission of light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(2), 023902 (2014). 27. A. Epstein and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Floquet-Bloch analysis of refracting Huygens metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. B 90(23), 235127 (2014). 28. A. Epstein and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Huygens’ metasurfaces via the equivalence principle: design and applications,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 33(2), A31 (2016). 29. E. F. Kuester, M. A. Mohamed, M. Piket-May, and C. L. Holloway, “Averaged Transition Conditions for Electromagnetic Fields at a Metafilm,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. 51(10), 2641–2651 (2003). 30. D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (PrenticeHall International, New Jersey, 1999) 31. A. M. Patel and A. Grbic, “A Printed Leaky-Wave Antenna Based on a Sinusoidally-Modulated Reactance Surface,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. 59(6), 2087–2096 (2011).

Abstract:At low frequencies outside the plasmonic range, strongly confined surface waves can be achieved on periodically structured metal surfaces, thereby allowing for the design of compact electromagnetic guiding devices. Here, we propose an approach to realize highly efficient transmission of spoof surface plasmons around 90-degree sharp bends on ultrathin metallic films in the microwave regime. We demonstrate that by judiciously engineering the structure, the dispersion relation can be designed to reduce the scattering. Furthermore, the reflection can be suppressed by proper structural decoration at the bending corner. A onedimensional scattering theory is employed to understand and verify the transmission properties of our waveguide bend structure. Our design scheme is not restricted to the specific structure we propose here but can be applied to other guiding components built up on two dimensional metal surfaces. ©2015 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (250.5403) Plasmonics; (160.3918) Metamaterials; (240.6690) Surface waves. References and links 1. W. L. Barnes, A. Dereux, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Surface plasmon subwavelength optics,” Nature 424(6950), 824– 830 (2003). 2. W. H. Tsai, Y. C. Tsao, H. Y. Lin, and B. C. Sheu, “Cross-point analysis for a multimode fiber sensor based on surface plasmon resonance,” Opt. Lett. 30(17), 2209–2211 (2005). 3. M. L. Brongersma and V. M. Shalaev, “Applied physics. The case for plasmonics,” Science 328(5977), 440–441 (2010). 4. J. Zhang, S. Xiao, M. Wubs, and N. A. Mortensen, “Surface plasmon wave adapter designed with transformation optics,” ACS Nano 5(6), 4359–4364 (2011). 5. Y. Luo, A. Aubry, and J. B. Pendry, “Electromagnetic contribution to surface-enhanced Raman scattering from rough metal surfaces: a transformation optics approach,” Phys. Rev. B 83(15), 155422 (2011). 6. Y. Luo, J. B. Pendry, and A. Aubry, “Surface plasmons and singularities,” Nano Lett. 10(10), 4186–4191 (2010). 7. P. Andrew, S. C. Kitson, and W. L. Barnes, “Surface-plasmon energy gaps and photoabsorption,” J. Mod. Opt. 44(2), 395–406 (1997). 8. J. L. Coutaz, M. Neviere, E. Pic, and R. Reinisch, “Experimental study of surface-enhanced second-harmonic generation on silver gratings,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 32(4), 2227–2232 (1985). 9. Y. Luo, D. Y. Lei, S. A. Maier, and J. B. Pendry, “Broadband light harvesting nanostructures robust to edge bluntness,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108(2), 023901 (2012). 10. J. B. Pendry, A. I. Fernandez-Dominguez, Y. Luo, and R. Zhao, “Capturing photons with transformation optics,” Nat. Phys. 9(8), 518–522 (2013). 11. Y. Luo, D. Y. Lei, S. A. Maier, and J. B. Pendry, “Transformation-optics description of plasmonic nanostructures containing blunt edges/corners: from symmetric to asymmetric edge rounding,” ACS Nano 6(7), 6492–6506 (2012). 12. J. B. Pendry, Y. Luo, and R. Zhao, “Transforming the optical landscape,” Science 348(6234), 521–524 (2015). 13. Y. Luo, R. Zhao, and J. B. Pendry, “van der Waals interactions at the nanoscale: the effects of nonlocality,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111(52), 18422–18427 (2014). 14. J. B. Pendry, L. Martín-Moreno, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, “Mimicking surface plasmons with structured surfaces,” Science 305(5685), 847–848 (2004). #241242 Received 18 May 2015; revised 29 Jun 2015; accepted 13 Jul 2015; published 15 Jul 2015 © 2015 OSA 27 Jul 2015 | Vol. 23, No. 15 | DOI:10.1364/OE.23.019074 | OPTICS EXPRESS 19074 15. J. J. Wood, L. A. Tomlinson, O. Hess, S. A. Maier, and A. I. Fernández-Domínguez, “Spoof plasmon polaritons in slanted geometries,” Phys. Rev. B 85(7), 075441 (2012). 16. F. J. Garcia-Vidal, L. Martin-Moreno, and J. B. Pendry, “Surfaces with holes in them: new plasmonic metamaterials,” J. Opt. A, Pure Appl. Opt. 7(2), S97–S101 (2005). 17. D. Martin-Cano, M. L. Nesterov, A. I. Fernandez-Dominguez, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, L. Martin-Moreno, and E. Moreno, “Domino plasmons for subwavelength terahertz circuitry,” Opt. Express 18(2), 754–764 (2010). 18. Y. G. Ma, L. Lan, S. M. Zhong, and C. K. Ong, “Experimental demonstration of subwavelength domino plasmon devices for compact high-frequency circuit,” Opt. Express 19(22), 21189–21198 (2011). 19. A. I. Fernández-Domínguez, L. Martín-Moreno, F. J. García-Vidal, S. R. Andrews, and S. A. Maier, “Spoof surface plasmon polariton modes propagating along periodically corrugated wires,” IEEE. J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 14(6), 1515–1521 (2008). 20. S. A. Maier, S. R. Andrews, L. Martín-Moreno, and F. J. García-Vidal, “Terahertz surface plasmon-polariton propagation and focusing on periodically corrugated metal wires,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97(17), 176805 (2006). 21. M. Navarro-Cía, M. Beruete, S. Agrafiotis, F. Falcone, M. Sorolla, and S. A. Maier, “Broadband spoof plasmons and subwavelength electromagnetic energy confinement on ultrathin metafilms,” Opt. Express 17(20), 18184– 18195 (2009). 22. X. Shen, T. J. Cui, D. Martin-Cano, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, “Conformal surface plasmons propagating on ultrathin and flexible films,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110(1), 40–45 (2013). 23. Z. Liao, Y. Luo, A. I. Fernández-Domínguez, X. Shen, S. A. Maier, and T. J. Cui, “High-order localized spoof surface plasmon resonances and experimental verifications,” Sci. Rep. 5, 9590 (2015). 24. H. C. Zhang, S. Liu, X. Shen, L. H. Chen, L. Li, and T. J. Cui, “Broadband amplification of spoof surface plasmon polaritons at microwave frequencies,” Laser Photonics Rev. 9(1), 83–90 (2015). 25. X. Wan, X. Shen, Y. Luo, and T. J. Cui, “Planar bifunctional Luneburg-fisheye lens made of an anisotropic metasurface,” Laser Photonics Rev. 8(5), 757–765 (2014). 26. J. J. Xu, H. C. Zhang, Q. Zhang, and T. J. Cui, “Efficient conversion of surface-plasmon-like modes to spatial radiated modes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 106(2), 021102 (2015). 27. H. F. Ma, X. P. Shen, Q. Cheng, W. X. Jiang, and T. J. Cui, “Broadband and high-efficiency conversion from guided waves to spoof surface plasmon polaritons,” Laser Photonics Rev. 8(1), 146–151 (2014). 28. B. Ng, J. Wu, S. M. Hanham, A. I. Fernándezu-Domínguez, N. Klein, Y. F. Liew, M. B. Breese, M. Hong, and S. A. Maier, “Spoof plasmon surfaces: a novel platform for THz sensing,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 1(8), 543–548 (2013). 29. Z. Liao, X. Shen, B. C. Pan, J. Zhao, Y. Luo, and T. J. Cui, “Combined system for efficient excitation and capture of LSP resonances and flexible control of SPP transmissions,” ACS Photonics 2(6), 738–743 (2015). 30. N. Yu, Q. J. Wang, M. A. Kats, J. A. Fan, S. P. Khanna, L. Li, A. G. Davies, E. H. Linfield, and F. Capasso, “Designer spoof surface plasmon structures collimate terahertz laser beams,” Nat. Mater. 9(9), 730–735 (2010). 31. Y. Liu, H. Shi, C. Wang, C. Du, and X. Luo, “Multiple directional beaming effect of metallic subwavelength slit surrounded by periodically corrugated grooves,” Opt. Express 16(7), 4487–4493 (2008). 32. T. Jiang, L. Shen, J. J. Wu, T. J. Yang, Z. Ruan, and L. Ran, “Realization of tightly confined channel plasmon polaritons at low frequencies,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 99(26), 261103 (2011). 33. W. Zhu, A. Agrawal, and A. Nahata, “Planar plasmonic terahertz guided-wave devices,” Opt. Express 16(9), 6216–6226 (2008). 34. A. I. Fernández-Domínguez, E. Moreno, L. Martin-Moreno, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, “Guiding terahertz waves along subwavelength channels,” Phys. Rev. B 79(23), 233104 (2009). 35. K. J. Kim, J. E. Kim, H. Y. Park, Y. H. Lee, S. H. Kim, S. G. Lee, and C. S. Kee, “Propagation of spoof surface plasmon on metallic square lattice: bending and splitting of self-collimated beams,” Opt. Express 22(4), 4050– 4058 (2014). 36. A. Mekis, J. C. Chen, I. Kurland, S. Fan, P. R. Villeneuve, and J. D. Joannopoulos, “High transmission through sharp bends in photonic crystal waveguides,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77(18), 3787–3790 (1996). 37. C. L. C. Smith, N. Stenger, A. Kristensen, N. A. Mortensen, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Gap and channeled plasmons in tapered grooves: a review,” Nanoscale 7(21), 9355–9386 (2015).

University of Birmingham Phenomenological modeling of geometric metasurfaces

Hybrid Bilayer Plasmonic Metasurface Efficiently Manipulates Visible Light

Special issue: Metamaterials and plasmonics in Asia, a tribute to Byoungho Lee

Syddansk Universitet Ultrathin 90-degree sharp bends for spoof surface plasmon

Plasmonic and Dielectric Metasurfaces: Design, Fabrication and Applications

Editorial on special issue "Metamaterials and Plasmonics in Asia"

Controlling Electromagnetic Waves with Meta-Surfaces

Broadband and Wide Field-of-view Plasmonic Metasurface-enabled Waveplates

Optically Active Plasmonic Metasurfaces Based on the Hybridization of In-Plane Coupling and Out-of-Plane Coupling.

Metamaterials: from 3D Plasmonic Nanostructure to Reflective Metasurface

High-Efficiency Metasurfaces: Principles, Realizations, and Applications

Near-field Plasmonic Beam Engineering with Complex Amplitude Modulation Based on Metasurface

A review of metasurfaces: physics and applications

A review of gap-surface plasmon metasurfaces: fundamentals and applications

Mode Controlling of Surface Plasmon Polaritons by Geometric Phases

Hyperbolic Metamaterial Devices for Wavefront Manipulation

Research Progress of Imaging Technologies Based on Electromagnetic Metasurfaces

Electromagnetic Metasurfaces: Physics and Applications

High-efficiency and tunable metasurfaces in reflective and transmissive geometries (Conference Presentation)

Manipulating Wave Propagation with Geometric Metasurfaces: Fundamentals and Applications

Hyperbolic spoof plasmons in layered equivalent graphene metasurfaces