Abstract:Background: Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures are designed to lessen dimensional changes in the alveolar ridge after tooth extraction. Wound healing after ridge preservation involves the formation of new vital bone in the former socket, and this vital bone is important in the osseointegration of dental implants. Methods: A series of ARP studies have been performed to help clinicians better understand the wound-healing events that occur following tooth extraction and ridge preservation. Different protocols have been examined using various materials and periods of healing time prior to implant placement. The primary aim of these studies was to ascertain the relative percentage of vital bone formation, residual graft material, and connective tissue (CT)/other at the healing site using histomorphometric examination of bone core biopsies obtained during osteotomy preparation. Results: For allografts, the use of demineralized bone alone or in combination with mineralized is associated with more vital bone formation than the use of mineralized allograft alone. For mineralized allografts, the use of cortical versus cancellous bone has only minimal impact on new bone formation. Xenografts from bovine and porcine sources appear to have similar vital bone formation. Longer healing times prior to implant placement are associated with increased vital bone formation and decreased residual graft material. The most stable component in most studies is the percentage of CT/other. Conclusions: The percentage of vital bone and residual graft at ARP sites is dependent on the materials used and the length of healing time prior to obtaining core biopsies. Key points: What factors may affect the amount of new bone at the ARP site? At a time point about 4 months after ARP, the type of graft material used for ARP plays a large role in new bone formation. Studies focus on means and standard deviations, but patients often do not "follow the mean." Even if a single ARP protocol is used for all patients, there is great interindividual variability in new bone formation, and there is often variability between sites within a single patient. How long after ARP with an allograft should I wait to place an implant? Longer healing times such as 4-5 months generally provide higher amounts of vital bone formation than shorter healing times like 2-3 months. Differences in vital bone formation between ARP protocols tend to decrease with longer healing time. FDBA that contains demineralized bone, either alone or combined with mineralized FDBA, often provides higher amounts of new bone formation than 100% mineralized allograft, especially at shorter healing periods. Even a year after ARP with an allograft, residual graft material is often still present at the ARP site.

Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Severely Damaged Molar Socket Using a Polylactic Acid Membrane Without Primary Wound Closure: A Case Series

Alveolar Ridge Preservation with The Use of Demineralized Bone Matrix Putty: Clinical, Radiographic and Histological Observations in A Case Series

The Assessment of Volumetric Changes for Alveolar Ridge Preservation or Reconstruction by Three-dimensional Analysis at Posterior Extraction Sites with Severe Bone Defects Using DBBM-C Collagen Membrane and PRF: A Prospective and Randomized Clinical Trial

Half‐ and full‐grafting alveolar ridge preservation with different sealing materials: A three‐arm randomized clinical trial

Alveolar regeneration of the post-extraction site with cortical deficiency using the Lamina Socket Sealing technique: Retrospective study with histomorphometric analysis of regenerated bone and evaluation of soft tissue changes. Part 2/2

Effectiveness of a collagen matrix seal and xenograft in alveolar ridge preservation: an experimental study in dogs

Ridge Alterations following Socket Preservation Using a Collagen Membrane in Dogs

Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using a Collagenated Xenograft: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Alveolar regeneration of the post-extraction site with cortical deficiency using the Lamina Socket Sealing technique: A retrospective study with clinical, radiographic and histomorphometric analysis. Part 1/2

Influence of Healing Time on the Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using a Collagenated Bovine Bone Xenograft: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Histological Evaluation of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Different Bone Grafts: Clinical Study Analysis Part II

Alveolar Ridge Regeneration With Open Versus Closed Healing in Damaged Extraction Sockets: A Preclinical In Vivo Study

Histologic wound healing in studies using different ridge preservation protocols: A review

Alveolar Ridge Preservation at Molar Extraction Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Alveolar Ridge Preservation at Molar Extraction Sites

Efficacy of Reactive Soft Tissue for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Prospective Cohort Study

Alveolar ridge preservation with fibroblast growth factor-2 modified acellular dermal matrix membrane and a bovine-derived xenograft: An experimental in vivo study

Socket Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Polylactide-Polyglycolide Acid Scaffold: Radiologic and Histologic Evaluation

Advancements in alveolar bone grafting and ridge preservation: a narrative review on materials, techniques, and clinical outcomes

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Collagen Matrix to Hemostatic Gelatin Sponge as Socket Seal in Alveolar Ridge Preservation

Composite Alloplastic Biomaterial vs. Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Ridge Preservation

Alveolar ridge preservation of two‐wall bone defects using mineralized dentin matrix: An experimental pre‐clinical study