Abstract:Background: Failure to fix the fractured fragment can result in bony fragment resorption and consequent glenoid bone loss. Current arthroscopic repair techniques might lead to insecure fixation and refracture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the transosseous sling-suture technique for bony Bankart lesions, and to compare the clinical outcomes for acute and chronic bony Bankart lesions treated with this technique.Methods: A retrospective case series consisting of 46 patients with bony fracture of the glenoid rim following traumatic injury was identified from May 2015 to August 2020. The patients were divided into the acute lesion group and the chronic lesion group according to the time from first injury to surgery. The size of bone fragment was used to group the patients into the small and the medium sized fragment groups. All the patients underwent arthroscopic repairs using the transosseous sling-suture technique. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations including Rowe score, West Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain scores, ROMs and number of dislocations were recorded. No significant differences were found in the comparisons of postoperative ROMs ang functional outcomes regarding between the small and the medium sized fragment groups.Results: No dislocations occurred for both groups postoperatively. At the last follow-up, all the ROMs (including anterior flexion, abduction, external rotation and internal rotation at the side), the Rowe score, the WOSI score and the VAS score for pain in the both groups were significantly improved compared to the preoperative evaluations (all Ps < 0.001). In the comparisons between the acute and the chronic lesion groups, significantly greater anterior flexion (158.9 +/- 8.9 degrees vs. 153.0 +/- 6.4 degrees, P = 0.037), abduction (167.7 +/- 10.1 degrees vs. 161.0 +/- 7.0 degrees, P = 0.035) and external rotation at the side (88.3 +/- 6.4 degrees vs. 83.5 +/- 5.5 degrees, P = 0.024) were found in the acute lesion group. The comparisons of the Rowe score (86.0 +/- 7.5 vs. 87.5 +/- 10.6, P = 0.319), the WOSI score (223.5 +/- 56.3 vs. 185.0 +/- 79.9, P = 0.062), the VAS score for pain (0.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 0.3 +/- 0.2, P = 0.324) and the internal rotation at the side (74.6 +/- 13.2 degrees vs. 80.5 +/- 11.1 degrees, P = 0.116) between these two groups did not demonstrate significant differences between the two groups.Conclusion: This arthroscopic transosseous sling-suture repair technique for shoulder anterior instability with acute and chronic bony Bankart lesion can restore joint stability, improve clinical outcomes and range of motion postoperatively. The acute bony Bankart lesion using the current technique can produce better range of motion compared to the chronic lesion.Study design: Retrospective case series; Level of evidence, 4.(c) 2023 Asia Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Longer peripheral-track lesions are associated with instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair

Validating the Glenoid Track Concept Using Dynamic Arthroscopic Assessment

Defining Critical Humeral Bone Loss: Inferior Craniocaudal Hill-Sachs Extension as Predictor of Recurrent Instability After Primary Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions

Characteristics of High-Risk Bipolar Bone Loss Lesions Using 3-Dimensional Imaging

Distance to Dislocation and Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: Rethinking the Glenoid Track Concept

Glenoid Track Width Is Smaller Under Dynamic Conditions: An In Vivo Dual-Fluoroscopy Imaging Study

Risk Factors for Recurrence Following Arthroscopic Bankart Repair – A Systematic

Long-term Effectiveness and Outcome-Determining Factors of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Recreational Sports Population: An Assessment of 100 Patients With a Mean Follow-up of 12.7 Years

The Global Track Concept for Assessment of Engaging Hill-Sachs Defects in Anterior Shoulder Instability

Glenolabral Articular Disruption (GLAD) Is Not Associated with Worse Outcomes or Higher Instability Recurrence after Arthroscopic Bankart Repair—A Matched-Pair Analysis

Borderline Glenoid Bone Defect in Anterior Shoulder Instability: Latarjet Procedure Versus Bankart Repair

Bone Fragment Resorption and Clinical Outcomes of Traumatic Bony Bankart Lesion Treated With Arthroscopic Repair Versus Open Latarjet

Effects of Bone Incorporation After Arthroscopic Stabilization Surgery for Bony Bankart Lesion Based on Preoperative Glenoid Defect Size

Accuracy and reliability of imaging modalities for studying bipolar bone loss in anterior shoulder instability: A systematic review

Stabilizing Mechanisms in Patients Treated Using Hill-Sachs Remplissage With Bankart Repair in Abduction–External Rotation Position

Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Dislocation Arthropathy: Radiological Long-term Outcome of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in 100 Shoulders at an Average 13-Year Follow-up

Arthroscopic Repair with Transosseous Sling-Suture Technique for Acute and Chronic Bony Bankart Lesions

Knotless Bioabsorbable Anchors Placed on the Glenoid Face for Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

What Is the Critical Value of Glenoid Bone Loss at Which Soft Tissue Bankart Repair Does Not Restore Glenohumeral Translation, Restricts Range of Motion, and Leads to Abnormal Humeral Head Position?

Effective glenoid track: A novel concept for shoulder instability