Distinct Neurofunctional Alterations During Motivational and Hedonic Processing of Natural and Monetary Rewards in Depression – a Neuroimaging Meta-Analysis
Mercy Chepngetich Bore,Xiqin Liu,Xianyang Gan,Lan Wang,Ting Xu,Stefania Ferraro,Liyuan Li,Bo Zhou,Jie Zhang,Deniz Vatansever,Bharat Biswal,Benjamin Klugah-Brown,Benjamin Becker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.07.22283197
IF: 10.592
2023-01-01
Psychological Medicine
Abstract:Reward processing dysfunctions are considered a candidate mechanism underlying anhedonia and apathy in depression. Neuroimaging studies have documented that neurofunctional alterations in mesocorticolimbic circuits may neurally mediate these dysfunctions. However, common and distinct neurofunctional alterations during motivational and hedonic evaluation of monetary (extrinsic) and natural (intrinsic) rewards in depression have not been systematically examined. Here, we capitalized on pre-registered neuroimaging meta-analyses to (1) establish general reward-related neural alterations in depression, (2) determine common and distinct alterations during the receipt and anticipation of monetary versus natural rewards, and, (3) characterize the differences on the behavioral, network and molecular level. The pre-registered meta-analysis () included 633 depressed patients and 644 healthy controls and revealed generally decreased subgenual anterior cingulate cortex and striatal reactivity towards rewards in depression. Subsequent comparative analysis indicated that monetary rewards led to decreased hedonic reactivity in the right ventral caudate while natural rewards led to decreased reactivity in the bilateral putamen. These regions exhibited distinguishable profiles on the behavioral, network and molecular level. Further analyses demonstrated that the right thalamus and left putamen showed decreased activation during the anticipation of monetary reward. The present results indicate that distinguishable neurofunctional alterations may neurally mediate reward-processing alterations in depression, in particular, with respect to monetary and natural rewards. Given that natural rewards prevail in everyday life, our findings suggest that reward-type specific interventions are warranted and challenge the generalizability of experimental tasks employing monetary incentives to capture reward dysregulations in everyday life. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 82271583; 32250610208) and the China Brain Project (MOST2030, Grant No. 2022ZD0208500). ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable. Yes