Abstract:Does every Boolean tautology have a short propositional-calculus proof? Here, a propositional-calculus (i.e. Frege) proof is any proof starting from a set of axioms and deriving new Boolean formulas using a fixed set of sound derivation rules. Establishing any super-polynomial size lower bound on Frege proofs (in terms of the size of the formula proved) is a major open problem in proof complexity, and among a handful of fundamental hardness questions in complexity theory by and large. Non-commutative arithmetic formulas, on the other hand, constitute a quite weak computational model, for which exponential-size lower bounds were shown already back in 1991 by Nisan [20], using a particularly transparent argument. In this work we show that Frege lower bounds in fact follow from corresponding size lower bounds on non-commutative formulas computing certain polynomials (and that such lower bounds on non-commutative formulas must exist, unless NP=coNP ). More precisely, we demonstrate a natural association between tautologies T to non-commutative polynomials p , such that: •if T has a polynomial-size Frege proof then p has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula; and conversely, when T is a DNF, if p has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula over GF (2) then T has a Frege proof of quasi-polynomial size. The argument is a characterization of Frege proofs as non-commutative formulas: we show that the Frege system is (quasi-) polynomially equivalent to a non-commutative Ideal Proof System (IPS), following the recent work of Grochow and Pitassi [10] that introduced a propositional proof system in which proofs are arithmetic circuits, and the work in [35] that considered adding the commutator as an axiom in algebraic propositional proof systems. This gives a characterization of propositional Frege proofs in terms of (non-commutative) arithmetic formulas that is tighter than (the formula version of IPS) in Grochow and Pitassi [10], in the following sense: (i) The non-commutative IPS is polynomial-time checkable -- whereas the original IPS was checkable in probabilistic polynomial-time; and (ii) Frege proofs unconditionally quasi-polynomially simulate the non-commutative IPS -- whereas Frege was shown to efficiently simulate IPS only assuming that the decidability of PIT for (commutative) arithmetic formulas by polynomial-size circuits is efficiently provable in Frege.

On Slicewise Monotone Parameterized Problems And Optimal Proof Systems For Taut

On Slicewise Monotone Parameterized Problems and Optimal Proof Systems for TAUT.

Hard Instances of Algorithms and Proof Systems

On the Complexity of Gödel's Proof Predicate

Characterizing Propositional Proofs As Non-Commutative Formulas.

Non-Commutative Formulas and Frege Lower Bounds: a New Characterization of Propositional Proofs.

A proof complexity conjecture and the Incompleteness theorem

Ruling Out Short Proofs of Unprovable Sentences is Hard

Approximability and proof complexity

Weighted, Circular and Semi-Algebraic Proofs

Towards Feasible Solutions of the Tautology Problem

Sound and Complete Proof Rules for Probabilistic Termination

A proof-theoretical approach to some extensions of first order quantification

On the algebraic proof complexity of Tensor Isomorphism

A Quantifier-Free String Theory for ALOGTIME Reasoning

The Parameterized Space Complexity of Model-Checking Bounded Variable First-Order Logic

Proof Theory and Decision Procedures for Deontic STIT Logics

Consistency, Optimality, and Incompleteness

Proof Theory for Positive Logic with Weak Negation

Learning to Prove Safety over Parameterised Concurrent Systems (Full Version)

From Almost Optimal Algorithms to Logics for Complexity Classes Via Listings and a Halting Problem