Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical results between minimally invasive percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy(PELD) and microsurgical lumbar discectomy(MSLD) for lumbar disc herniation(LDH). Methods From June 2013 to December 2014, 256 patients with LDH in the Affiliated Provincial Hospital of Anhui Medical University underwent discectomy were enrolled in the research. One hundred and thirty-two patients were treated with MSLD and 124 cases with the PELD. The following measuring instruments were used: Visual analog scale for pain, the Oswestry Disability Index for patients′function and modified MacNab method for clinical outcome. The perioperative index, relief of the low back and leg pain, and clinical evaluation of each group were documented and compared respectively. Results All patients had been followed up for 5 to 35 months, averaged (20. 3 ± 4. 8) months and (19. 5 ± 5. 0) months in the MSLD group and PELD group, respectively. Overall, the PELD group had shorter surgical incision, shorter hospital stay and faster return to work than the MSLD group; however, operating time and radiation exposure were more than MSLD (all P values < 0. 01). The postoperative ODI and VAS score were significantly improved compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (all P values < 0. 05); the VAS of back and leg pain in MSLD group were significantly better than those in the PELD group at 1 and 3 months (all P values < 0. 01), but no significant difference was found at 6 months and last follow-up (P > 0. 05). There was no significant difference in the main clinical outcome criteria ODI between the PELD and the MSLD group. According to the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent and good rates were 94. 7% (125 / 132)and 94. 3% (117 / 124) in the MSLD and PELD groups in the latest follow-up, respectively, and the differences between the 2 groups were not statistically significant (χ2 = 0. 015, P > 0. 05). There was no incidence of greater artery injury in each group. In MSLD group, there were 2 patients with nerve root traction injury, 1 patient with dural tear. In PELD group, there were 5 patients with postoperative dysesthesia of exiting root, 1 patient with neck pain during operation, and remnant disc fragment was found in one patient with highly migrated disc herniation. There were 2 patients of recurrence with disc herniations in each group, and were all treated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumber iterbody fusion. Conclusions Both PELD and MSLD are effective treatments for patients with LDH, and can get satisfactory clinical results. PELD have some advantages of less trauma, less pain, less duration of hospital stay, local anesthesia and early function recovery. However, it needs more radiation exposure and operation time, and it is difficult in some special patients (such as large, calcified and highly migrated disc herniations), PELD may be helpful for these patients.

Application of A Modified Cannula Insertion Technique for Selective Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Clinical application of microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Therapeutic effect analysis of targeted percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation

Surgical Strategy and Outcomes of Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation Following a Previous Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy <i>via</i> the medial foraminal and interlaminar approaches: A comparative study with 2-year follow-up

Transforaminal Versus Interlaminar Approach of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Under Local Anesthesia for L5/S1 Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The Strategy and Early Clinical Outcome of Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar or Extraforaminal Approach for Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Microsurgical Laminotomy

Minial Invasival Study and Clinical Application of Lumbar Discectomy Via Percutaneous Endoscopic Approach vs on ;Lumber Disk Herniation

C-arm-guided versus ultrasound volumetric navigation-guided percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study

Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and microsurgical lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation

Comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and open discectomy for single-segment lumbar disc herniation

A Suture Technique Combining Annulus Fibrosis with Posterior Longitudinal Ligament for Lumbar Disc Herniation under Endoscopy

Can the Novel Lumbo-Iliac Triangle Technique Based on Biplane Oblique Fluoroscopy Facilitate Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Patients with L5-S1 Disc Herniation Combined with High Iliac Crest? A Case-Control Study of 100 Patients

ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERRUPT PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY THROUGH INTERLAMINAR APPROACH FOR L5, S1 DISC PROTRUSION

Analysis of the clinical efficacy of visualization of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with annulus fibrosus suture in lumbar disc herniation

A retrospective comparative study of local anesthesia only and local anesthesia with sedation for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy

Feasibility and clinic application of percutaneous lateral endoscopic discectomy

Is Endoscopic Surgery a Safe and Effective Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using a Double‐Cannula Guide Tube for Large Lumbar Disc Herniation

[Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar Approach Discectomy for Central Lumbar Disc Extrusion].