<SUP>68</SUP>Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET/CT on gross tumour volume delineation for radiotherapy planning of oesophageal cancer

Liang Zhao,Shanyu Chen,Sijia Chen,Yizhen Pang,Yaqing Dai,Shenping Hu,Li'e Lin,Lirong Fu,Long Sun,Hua Wu,Haojun Chen,Qin Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.02.015
IF: 6.901
2021-01-01
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Abstract:Background and purpose: To compare Ga-68-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) and F-18-FDG PET/ CT in imaging locally advanced oesophageal cancer, and evaluate the potential usefulness of Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT on gross target volume (GTV) delineation aimed at radiotherapy planning for oesophageal cancer as compared with contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) and F-18-FDG PET/CT. Materials and methods: Twenty-one patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer who underwent both F-18-FDG and Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT scans were selected. GTVs of the primary tumours based on CE-CT (GTV(CT)), PET/CT, and CE-CT plus PET/CT were delineated. Gross tumour lengths were measured by GTVs and endoscopy and recorded. Results: The Ga-68-FAPI PET showed significantly higher radiotracer uptake than F-18-FDG PET (median SUVmax 16.71 vs. 11.23; P = 0.002) in the primary tumours. SUV thresholds of FAPI x20%, 30%, 40%, and FDG x40% showed similar lesion lengths compared with that in endoscopic examination (P > 0.05). GTV(CT) demonstrated the largest volume (median: 48.80 mm(3), range: 14.83-162.23 mm(3)) than PET-based GTVs. For PET/CT-guided complementary contouring of GTV(CT), four patients (19%) were increased by FAPI x20% and 30%, two patients (9.5%) were increased by FAPI x40%, and only one patient was increased by FDG x40%. Furthermore, the volume of GTV based on CE-CT plus FAPI x20%, 30%, and 40% showed no significant difference with GTV(CT) and planning target volume based CE-CT plus FAPI-PET and meets the organ at risk standard. Conclusion: The Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT methodology showed favourable tumour-to-background contrast in oesophageal cancer and might provide additional information for target volume delineation and help avoid tumour geographic misses. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?