The Contribution of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT to Staging and Prognosis in Gastric Cancer

Ediz Beyhan,Tevfik Fikret Çermik,Özge Erol Fenercioğlu,Rahime Şahin,Göksel Alçin,Tamer Aksoy,Esra Arslan,Nurhan Ergül
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005394
2024-10-01
Abstract:Aim: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic capabilities of 18 F-FDG PET/CT and 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging in staging gastric carcinoma, exploring the impact of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT on treatment planning and its prognostic significance. Methods: The research included 31 patients undergoing staging for gastric cancer, who received both 18 F-FDG PET/CT and 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT scans. We compared the SUV max and SUV mean of the primary tumor and lymph nodes, the count of organ metastases, tumor-to-background ratios, and overall staging accuracy. Additionally, the study evaluated radiological progression-free survival and overall survival rates. Results: The 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated superior efficacy in identifying the primary tumor compared with 18 F-FDG PET/CT, particularly in cases of poorly cohesive, signet-ring cell, and mucinous subtypes, with detection rates of 96.7% versus 77.4% ( P = 0.006 and P = 0.008, respectively). Analysis of lymph nodes showed a significantly higher detection of positive nodes with 68 Ga-FAPI-04 ( P = 0.026), although no significant differences were observed in SUV max and tumor-to-background ratio on a patient basis ( P > 0.05). SUV max and tumor-to-background ratios for peritoneal involvement were notably higher with 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT compared with 18 F-FDG PET/CT ( P = 0.04 for both). No significant differences were found in the detection of organ metastases and disease stage between the 2 imaging modalities ( P > 0.05). Primary tumor uptake did not significantly impact radiological progression-free survival or overall survival in either modality. Conclusions: 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging surpasses 18 F-FDG PET/CT in detecting the primary tumor, especially in poorly cohesive and signet-ring cell gastric cancer types, and offers improved accuracy in disease staging. This indicates its potential to enhance treatment management and prognostic assessment in gastric cancer patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?