PCN13 Quality-of-Life (QOL) Results from the Phase 3 Rainbow-ASIA Study of Ramucirumab PLUS Paclitaxel (RAM/PTX) Versus Placebo PLUS Paclitaxel (PBO/PTX) in Patients with Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma (AGC)

R. Xu,L. Shen,Y. Qin,S. Qin,X. Yin,B. Liu,S. Tanasanvimon,C. Zhou,W. Zhang,L. Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.04.105
IF: 5.156
2021-01-01
Value in Health
Abstract:In RAINBOW-Asia study (NCT02898077), a bridging study of RAINBOW, RAM/PTX compared with PBO/PTX demonstrated consistent efficacy benefit [PFS: 4.14 vs. 3.15 months, Hazard ratio (HR)=0.765, p=0.0184; OS: 8.71 vs. 7.92 months, HR=0.963] and safety profile with RAINBOW study in a predominantly Chinese population with AGC as 2nd-line therapy. Here we will present results of QoL of the study. Patients with AGC who previously received fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based therapy were randomized at 2:1 ratio to receive RAM/PTX or PBO/PTX. Patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 (v3) at baseline, first day of each 4-week cycle and at discontinuation. Scores were classified as improved or deteriorated if changed by ≥10 points (on 100-point scale) relative to baseline, otherwise classified as stable. Time to deterioration in QoL parameters was defined as duration from randomization to first deterioration. HRs and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazard model. Of 440 patients randomized, 272/294 (92.5%) of RAM/PTX and 133/146 (91.1%) of PBO/PTX patients provided both baseline and post-baseline data. Percentage of compliance was high (>95% in most cycles) and similar between arms. For all QoL parameters, the proportion of patients reporting improved or stable scores was generally similar between arms at all on-therapy assessment times. For time to deterioration, HRs for 11 of the 15 QoL scales had 95% CI that included 1, indicating no significant difference in those scales between arms. HRs for 4 symptom scales including dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, and diarrhea did not favor RAM/PTX arm, which was consistent with slightly higher incidence of all-grade (primarily low-grade) treatment-emergent adverse events in this arm. Similar proportion of patients reported improved or stable QoL scores between arms and no evidence of detriment to QoL in majority of scales by treatment with RAM/PTX as 2nd-line therapy in this population.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?