Abstract:Basing on the study of criminal judgments for 70,000 cases from 77 courts of 21 provinces and municipalities,this paper intends to answer the question of the relationship between practical sentencing status and statutory sentencing range of Chinese Criminal Law.According to this research,the mean of declaratory sentences of those cases without consideration of any statutory sentencing factor is generally lower than the median of their statutory sentencing range. Lower than the median of statutory range,as a group choice of judges,such mean is both legitimate and reasonable.In fact,the sentencing benchmark in the "Sentencing Advisory Guidelines of People's Court" issued by the Supreme People's Court of China is also significantly lower than the median of statutory range.According to this research,once we take the provisions from Criminal Law and Sentencing Advisory Guidelines as the dominant sentencing benchmark,then,the practical mean of declaratory sentence of crime without statutory factors can be deemed as the recessive sentencing benchmark,the third frame of reference for sentencing practice. By following this,we never intend to restrict judges' discretional act,instead,we offer better choices for them.This policy of persuasion,through respecting the activity of judges and encouraging them to be close to the average of judicial practice,will lead individual judge to keep consistency with other judges.Still,it can effectively avoid the whirlwind of ups and downs in sentencing practice.Furthermore, the mean of declaratory sentence of crime without statutory factors can learn actively and be adjusted passively.All in all,the plan of abstracting such mean from good —sized model cases should be an active experiment of absorbing the essential parts of common law into our statutory law system.

Do Confessions Contribute To Lenient Punishments In China? An Empirical Study Based On Crimes-Of-Intentional-Injury Trials

Confidence in the Criminal Justice System: Differences Between Citizens and Criminal Justice Officials in China

Sex Offenses Against Minors In China: An Empirical Comparison

Public Opinions on Criminal Trials in China: A Comparative Study of Chinese College Students in the PRC and Hong Kong

Predictors of Death Penalty Views in China: an Empirical Comparison Between College Students and Citizens

Unpacking the Exclusionary Rule of Repeated Confessions in China

Legal Values of the Rule of Voluntary Confession

Voluntary Surrender and Confession in Chinese Law: The Problem of Continuity

Regulating the Power of Chinese Police Through the Exclusionary Rule – an Empirical Study

China's criminal justice reforms against youth violence: punishment with leniency?

Sentencing Disparity and Sentencing Guidelines: the Case of China

Delinquent Subculture and Juvenile Offenders’ Attitudes Toward the Police in China

Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law

Verbal Confession and Obtain Evidence by Torture

An Empirical Study on the Change of Accusation

The Relationship among Criminal Charges,Crime and Penalties─A Perspective Based on China's Crime Rate Statistics

Mean of Declaratory Sentence of Crime without Statutory Sentencing Factors and Its Significance

The Proper Orientation of China’s Lawyer on Duty System—Discussion on the Leniency System of Pleading Guilty and Accepting Penalty

Sentencing Disparities in Corruption Cases in China

Influence of Religiosity and Studying Law on College Students’ Punitive Attitudes in China

Sentencing Recommendations, Anchoring Effect and Fairness in Criminal Justice—An Empirical Study Based on a Sample of 520 Sentences in K City