Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the legal complications prevail towards the architecture of mutual policy design between trade and climate change regimes. The recent literature on this topic is mainly focused on commons and has significantly ignored the existing regulatory constraints between both the regimes. Therefore, in this study relevant WTO and environmental laws are critically examined in order to bring another side of literally work on trade‐climate policy framework. Moreover, the time factor, role of developing countries and two approaches are also discussed that are important constituents to be considered during ongoing climate change multilateral talks. Design/methodology/approach This paper has six parts in total. Part one comprises of “Introduction”, part two gives “Overview of relevant WTO and climate change regulations”, part three describes “Antithesis of WTO and climate change rules” and explains the differences that both regimes posses in the basics of their nature, part four enumerates that how to galvanize the anticipated disputes among both the regimes, part five is focused on the participation of developing countries and their possible reservations towards climate policy and, part six gives some concluding remarks. Findings This study found four major points of caution while architecting climate change policy. First, the climate change policy gives excuse to certain economies to protect their domestic industry, which is supposedly the violation of WTO rules. Second, the disputes arise at WTO platform from the climate friendly trade policies would be a new inconvincible challenge. Third, the GATT article XX (general exceptions) and agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures (ASCM) are still not clearly defined under climate change regime. Fourth, the position of least developed countries (LDCs), there is no action plan as these countries are the most affected due to possible stringent trade‐climate policies. Research limitations/implications This research posses potential policy implication for both governments and international organizations, and provides new direction to trade and climate change researchers. It opens the way to critically examine the legal issues addressed in this paper which subsequently help both trade climate change regimes to overcome such regulatory differences with mutual consensus. Practical implications As policy implication this study suggests that what has been achieved during last two decades over climate change issue, and how long would it take to achieve the reasonable targets? In‐fact, the past work has succeeded to address the climate change as the global issue and it needs to be solved jointly but there is still a long way to make potential progress in order to architect the comprehensive policy and designing of multilateral agreements. It needs more time to constitute a climate change regime free from individual countries' political and economical interests and consensus amongst all major countries and group. Originality/value Most the current literature only focuses common options between trade and climate change policy regimes and significantly ignores the potential legal constraints. In this regards, this study fills existing gap in trade and climate change policy constraints and gives another new direction for policy makers.

The Political Economy of Climate Change: the Impasse and Way Out

Climate Change, Carbon Neutrality: the Role of Spatial Economics

Greening Capitalism? A Marxist Critique of Carbon Markets

Complexity, economic science and possible economic benefits of climate change mitigation policy

A climate for change? The impacts of climate change on energy politics

The economics of immense risk, urgent action and radical change: towards new approaches to the economics of climate change

The Challenging Economic and Social Issues of Climate Change: Introduction

The evolution of China's climate change policy: international and domestic political economy and a strategy for working with China

Political Strategies to Overcome Climate Policy Obstructionism

Global Climate Change,Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions,and Fair and Just Development——From the Perspective of Economics

Market Strategies for Climate Change

Some Economic Aspects Of Climate Change

Climate politics in global Hobbesian Jungle

The Public Economics of Climate Change

The Copenhagen Climate Change Conference from the Technoscience Perspective

Pathways Versus Incentives: Climate Activism to Climate Aligned Portfolio Management

Climate Change and Trade Policy: from Legal Complications to Time Factor

Beyond Green Capitalism: Social–Ecological Transformation and Perspectives of a Global Green-Left

Klaus Mathis, Bruce R. Huber, Energy Law and Economics

Creating An Earth Atmospheric Trust

The Wicked Problem Of Climate Change: A New Approach Based On Social Mess And Fragmentation