Abstract:Background: Negative remodeling of the distal aorta due to residual dissection significantly impacts the long-term outcomes of dissection patients after proximal repair of acute aortic dissection. Branched/fenestrated aortic stents are technically demanding, and studies of the first generation of multilayer flow modulators for tackling this clinical scenario are few and limited. The single-center results from a multicenter, prospective, and randomized controlled study aimed to verify the safety and effectiveness of a newly-designed flowdynamics dense mesh stent for treating residual dissection after proximal repair. Methods: Patients with nonchronic residual dissection involving visceral branches were prospectively enrolled in 3 centers (ChiCTR1900023638). Eligible patients were randomly assigned to the flowdynamics dense mesh stent (FDMS) group and control group. Follow-up visits were arranged at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after recruitment. The primary endpoints were all-cause and aortic-related mortality. The secondary endpoints included visceral branch occlusion, reintervention, and severe adverse events. Morphological changes were analyzed to exhibit the therapeutic effect. Our center participated in the multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial, and the preliminary single-center experience was reported. Results: Thirty-six patients were enrolled in our center, and the baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable. Thirty-four patients completed the 12 month follow-up. Freedom from all-cause and aortic-related death were 94.4% and 100%. All visceral branches remained patent in the FDMS group. Increased area of the true lumen (1.03±0.38 vs 0.48±0.63 cm2 at the plane below renal arteries, p=0.006; 1.27±0.80 vs 0.32±0.50 cm2 at the plane 5 cm below renal arteries, p<0.001) and decreased area of the false lumen at the plane below renal arteries (-1.03±0.84 vs -0.15±1.21 cm2, p=0.023) were observed in the FDMS group compared with those parameters in the control group. The FDMS group showed a significant increase in true lumen volume (p<0.001) and a significant decrease in false lumen volume (p=0.018). Conclusions: This newly-designed FDMS for endovascular repair of residual dissection after the proximal repair is safe and effective at 12 months. Clinical impact: One-year results of the randomized controlled clinical trial indicated the short-term safety and promising effect of FDMS on treating non-chronic residual dissection after proximal repair. At the 12th-month follow-up, the true lumen expanded, the false lumen shrunk and all visceral arteries kept patent. As far as I'm concerned, this is the first randomized controlled study concerning utilizing multilayer flow mesh stent treating aortic dissection. Despite a preliminary single-center report, our results are supposed to provide high-quality evidence to guide clinical practice and fill the gap in the application of FDMS.

Biomechanical Insight of the Stent-Induced Thrombosis Following Flow-Diverting Strategy in the Management of Complicated Aortic Aneurysms

Endovascular Treatment of Complicated Aortic Aneurysms Using a Modified Flow-Diverting Strategy: Mid- to Long-Term Outcome from a Multicenter Cohort Study

Computational fluid dynamics analysis of flow reduction induced by flow-diverting stents in intracranial aneurysms: a patient-unspecific hemodynamics change perspective

Non-invasive Evaluation of Fluid Dynamic of Aortoiliac Atherosclerotic Disease: Impact of Bifurcation Angle and Different Stent Configurations

Management of Complicated Aortic Aneurysms Using Multiple Overlapping Uncovered Stents

Early Results of the Newly-Designed Flowdynamics Dense Mesh Stent for Residual Dissection After Proximal Repair of Stanford Type A or Type B Aortic Dissection: A Preliminary Single-Center Report From a Multicenter, Prospective, and Randomized Study

The Interactions Between Bloodstream and Vascular Structure on Aortic Dissecting Aneurysmal Model: A Numerical Study

Biomechanical Mechanism of Distal Stent-Graft-induced New Entry Deterioration after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Computer simulation and hemodynamic analysis for sole stent treatment of fusiform aneurysm

Haemodynamic Effects of Stent Diameter and Compaction Ratio on Flow-Diversion Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Numerical Study of a Successful and an Unsuccessful Case.

The role of aorta distal to stent in the occurrence of distal stent graft-induced new entry tear: A computational fluid dynamics and morphological study

Hemodynamics Simulation of Intervention for Serial Saccular Aneurysm with Semi-Circular Section Stent

One-year results of the flowdynamics dense mesh stent for residual dissection after proximal repair of stanford type a or type b aortic dissection: a multicenter, prospective and randomized study

Hemodynamic Effects of Stenting on Intracranial Bifurcation Aneurysms

Fluid-structure Interaction Based Study on the Physiological Factors Affecting the Behaviors of Stented and Non-Stented Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms

Research Progress On Complications Of Intracranial Aneurysms With Flow-Diverting Stents

Hemodynamic Parameters Predict In-stent Thrombosis After Multibranched Endovascular Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Retrospective Study of Branched Stent-Graft Thrombosis

Computational haemodynamics in two idealised cerebral wide-necked aneurysms after stent placement.

High Wall Stress May Predict the Formation of Stent-Graft–Induced New Entries after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Risk Factors for In-Stent Stenosis After Flow Diverter Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 2350 Patients

Hemodynamic parameters impact the stability of distal stent graft-induced new entry