Abstract:Microseismic monitoring system is one of the effective means to monitor ground stress in deep mines. The accuracy and speed of microseismic signal identification directly affect the stability analysis in rock engineering. At present, manual identification, which heavily relies on manual experience, is widely used to classify microseismic events and blasts in the mines. To realize intelligent and accurate identification of microseismic events and blasts, a microseismic signal identification system based on machine learning was established in this work. The discrimination of microseismic events and blasts was established based on the machine learning framework. The microseismic monitoring data was used to optimize the parameters and validate the classification methods. Subsequently, ten machine learning algorithms were used as the preliminary algorithms of the learning layer, including the Decision Tree, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, SVM, KNN, GBDT, Naive Bayes, Bagging, AdaBoost, and MLP. Then, training set and test set, accounting for 50% of each data set, were prospectively examined, and the ACC, PPV, SEN, NPV, SPE, FAR and ROC curves were used as evaluation indexes. Finally, the performances of these machine learning algorithms in microseismic signal identification were evaluated with cross-validation methods. The results showed that the Logistic Regression classifier had the best performance in parameter identification, and the accuracy of cross-validation can reach more than 0.95. Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Naive Bayes also performed well in this data set. There were some differences in the accuracy of different classifiers in the training set, test set, and all data sets. To improve the accuracy of signal identification, the database of microseismic events and blasts should be expanded, to avoid the inaccurate data distribution caused by the small training set. Artificial intelligence identification methods, including Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, and AdaBoost algorithms, were applied to signal identification of the microseismic monitoring system in mines, and the identification results were consistent with the actual situation. In this way, the confusion caused by manual classification between microseismic events and blasts based on the characteristics of waveform signals is solved, and the required source parameters are easily obtained, which can ensure the accuracy and timeliness of microseismic events and blasts identification.

Microseismic Signal Classification Based On Artificial Neural Networks

A novel microseismic classification model based on bimodal neurons in an artificial neural network

A novel identification method of microseismic events based on empirical mode decomposition and artificial neural network features

Classification of Microseismic Signals Using Machine Learning

Machine Learning Based Identification of Microseismic Signals Using Characteristic Parameters

Fine Classification Method for Massive Microseismic Signals Based on Short-Time Fourier Transform and Deep Learning

Microseismic Event Recognition and Transfer Learning Based on Convolutional Neural Network and Attention Mechanisms

Deep Neural Network for Distinguishing Microseismic Signals and Blasting Vibration Signals Based on Deep Learning of Spectrum Features

Characteristics and Classification of Microseismic Signals in Heading Face of Coal Mine: Implication for Coal and Gas Outburst Warning

Multi-Classification of Complex Microseismic Waveforms Using Convolutional Neural Network: A Case Study in Tunnel Engineering

Automatic Events Recognition in Low SNR Microseismic Signals of Coal Mine Based on Wavelet Scattering Transform and SVM

Identifying microseismic events using a dual-channel CNN with wavelet packets decomposition coefficients

Automatic Waveform Classification and Arrival Picking Based on Convolutional Neural Network

Improved Mine Microseismic Event Recognition Method Combining Neural Network and Transfer Learning.

Automatic Classification of Microseismic Signals Based on MFCC and GMM-HMM in Underground Mines

Microseismic event waveform classification using CNN-based transfer learning models

Automatic High-Resolution Microseismic Event Detection Via Supervised Machine Learning

Microseismic records classification using capsule network with limited training samples in underground mining

Quality control of microseismic P-phase arrival picks in coal mine based on machine learning

Identification method for microseismic, acoustic emission and electromagnetic radiation interference signals of rock burst based on deep neural networks

Explainable time–frequency convolutional neural network for microseismic waveform classification