Sexual Harassment In Front Of An Audience

Martin Plath,Oeznur Oeztuerk,Lisa Padur,Juliane Wedekind,Bruno Streit
2010-01-01
Abstract:Male Atlantic mollies (Poecilia mexicana) almost constantly attempt to mate, while females are mostly non-responsive to male approaches. Females flee from this sexual harassment and, thus, are more vigilant in the presence of males, so females may have hampered feeding opportunities. On the other hand, several recent studies reported on so-called audience effects in P. mexicana, whereby the visual presence of a potential rival affects male sexual activity. We asked whether and how audience effects interact with male sexual harassment. Focal females were given an opportunity to feed in the presence of a male or a female partner, and the difference in feeding times was interpreted as an effect caused by male harassment. Tests were conducted without an audience (1), or an audience male was visually presented either directly inside the test tank (2), or further away [in an adjoining compartment (3)]. We found that levels of pre-mating behavior did not vary significantly among treatments, but males exhibited more copulation attempts (thrusting) in treatment (3), suggesting that males respond to increased risk of sperm competition with higher sperm expenditure. Females fed less (and started feeding later) when a harassing partner male was around, and this effect was not dependent on the audience treatment, but, overall, females spent more time feeding (and started feeding earlier) when an audience was presented. Hence, feeding time reductions appear to be independent of audience effects, but perceived "safety in numbers" may lead to increased foraging in larger groups.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?